Literature DB >> 200526

Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.

O Ohnishi.   

Abstract

Polygenic mutations affecting viability were accumulated on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster by treating flies with EMS in successive generations. The treated chromosomes were later made homozygous and tested for their effects on viability by comparison of the frequency of such homozygotes with that of other genotypes in the same culture. The treated wild-type chromosomes were kept heterozygous in Pm/+ males by mating individual males in successive generations to Cy/Pm females. The number of generations of accumulation was 1 to 30 generations, depending on the concentration of EMS. A similar experiment for spontaneous polygenic mutations was also conducted by accumulating mutations for 40 generations. The lower limit of the spontaneous mutation rate of viability polygenes is estimated to be 0.06 per second chromosome per generation, which is about 12 times as high as the spontaneous recessive lethal mutation rate, 0.005. EMS-induced polygenic mutations increase linearly with the number of treated generations and with the concentration of EMS. The minimum mutation rate of viability polygenes is about 0.017 per 10(-4)m, which is only slightly larger than the lethal rate of 0.013 per 10(-4) m. The maximum estimate of the viability reduction of a single mutant is about 6 to 10 percent of the normal viability. The data are consistent with a constant average effect per mutant at all concentrations, but this is about three times as high as that for spontaneous mutants. It is obvious that one can obtain only a lower limit for the mutation rate, since some mutants may have effects so near to zero that they cannot be detected. The possibility of measuring something other than the lower limit is discussed. The ratio of the load due to detrimental mutants to that caused by lethals, the D/L ratio, is about 0.2 to 0.3 for EMS-induced mutants, as compared to about 0.5 for spontaneous mutants. This is to be expected if EMS treatment produces a large fraction of small deletions and other chromosome rearrangements which are more likely to be lethal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 200526      PMCID: PMC1213759     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  3 in total

1.  A study of spontaneous mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G J PAXMAN
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  A Comparative Study of Mutation Rates in Two Ecologically Diverse Species of Drosophila.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; B Spassky; N Spassky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A Comparison of the Effect of Lethal and Detrimental Chromosomes from Drosophila Populations.

Authors:  R Greenberg; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1960-08       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total
  34 in total

1.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Chavarrías; C López-Fanjul; A García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects.

Authors:  P D Keightley; E K Davies; A D Peters; R G Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.

Authors:  T Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Efficiency of truncation selection.

Authors:  J F Crow; M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected.

Authors:  Sarah B Joseph; David W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; David Chavarrías; Enrique Sánchez; Antonio Manrique; Carlos López-Fanjul; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.