Literature DB >> 12702680

Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

James D Fry1, Sergey V Nuzhdin.   

Abstract

There have been several attempts to estimate the average dominance (ratio of heterozygous to homozygous effects) of spontaneous deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, but these have given inconsistent results. We investigated whether transposable element (TE) insertions have higher average dominance for egg-to-adult viability than do point mutations, a possibility suggested by the types of fitness-depressing effects that TEs are believed to have. If so, then variation in dominance estimates among strains and crosses would be expected as a consequence of variation in TE activity. As a first test, we estimated the average dominance of all mutations and of copia insertions in a set of lines that had accumulated spontaneous mutations for 33 generations. A traditional regression method gave a dominance estimate for all mutations of 0.17, whereas average dominance of copia insertions was 0.51; the difference between these two estimates approached significance (P = 0.08). As a second test, we reanalyzed Ohnishi 1974 data on dominance of spontaneous and EMS-induced mutations. Because a considerable fraction of spontaneous mutations are caused by TE insertions, whereas EMS induces mainly point mutations, we predicted that average dominance would decline with increasing EMS concentration. This pattern was observed, but again fell short of formal significance (P = 0.07). Taken together, however, the two results give modest support for the hypothesis that TE insertions have greater average dominance in their viability effects than do point mutations, possibly as a result of deleterious effects of expression of TE-encoded genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12702680      PMCID: PMC1462516     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  32 in total

1.  Sure facts, speculations, and open questions about the evolution of transposable element copy number.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Rapid mutational declines of viability in Drosophila.

Authors:  J D Fry
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  The mutational rate of Drosophila viability decline: tinkering with old data.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  P regulatory products repress in vivo the P promoter activity in P-lacZ fusion genes.

Authors:  B Lemaitre; D Coen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of single P-element insertions on bristle number and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R F Lyman; F Lawrence; S V Nuzhdin; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. Coupling-repulsion effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability.

Authors:  T Mukai; T Yamazaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  OM Mutations in DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE Are Linked to Insertions of a Transposable Element.

Authors:  A E Shrimpton; E A Montgomery; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Drosophila P element transposase induces male recombination additively and without a requirement for P element excision or insertion.

Authors:  M McCarron; A Duttaroy; G Doughty; A Chovnick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Dominance effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability in heterozygous genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  T Mukai; S Chigusa; I Yoshikawa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A D Peters; D L Halligan; M C Whitlock; P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Gene action of new mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ruth G Shaw; Shu-Mei Chang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; David Chavarrías; Enrique Sánchez; Antonio Manrique; Carlos López-Fanjul; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation.

Authors:  Federico Manna; Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Obstruction of adaptation in diploids by recessive, strongly deleterious alleles.

Authors:  Zoe June Assaf; Dmitri A Petrov; Jamie R Blundell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.