Literature DB >> 11344421

Accomplishments and challenges of surgical simulation.

R M Satava1.   

Abstract

For nearly a decade, advanced computer technologies have created extraordinary educational tools using three-dimensional (3D) visualization and virtual reality. Pioneering efforts in surgical simulation with these tools have resulted in a first generation of simulators for surgical technical skills. Accomplishments include simulations with 3D models of anatomy for practice of surgical tasks, initial assessment of student performance in technical skills, and awareness by professional societies of potential in surgical education and certification. However, enormous challenges remain, which include improvement of technical fidelity, standardization of accurate metrics for performance evaluation, integration of simulators into a robust educational curriculum, stringent evaluation of simulators for effectiveness and value added to surgical training, determination of simulation application to certification of surgical technical skills, and a business model to implement and disseminate simulation successfully throughout the medical education community. This review looks at the historical progress of surgical simulators, their accomplishments, and the challenges that remain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11344421     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  20 in total

1.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures.

Authors:  S L Delp; J P Loan; M G Hoy; F E Zajac; E L Topp; J M Rosen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Assessing a virtual reality surgical skills simulator.

Authors:  R Johnston; S Bhoyrul; L Way; R Satava; K McGovern; J D Fletcher; S Rangel; R B Loftin
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1996

3.  A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  J Y Chung; J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

6.  A typology of simulators for medical education.

Authors:  G Meller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

Authors:  R Reznick; G Regehr; H MacRae; J Martin; W McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents.

Authors:  H Faulkner; G Regehr; J Martin; R Reznick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  CAD-based graphical computer simulation in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  U G Kuehnapfel; B Neisius
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-06
View more
  27 in total

1.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

3.  Self-reported versus observed scores in laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  A K Madan; C T Frantzides; C Tebbit; N Shervin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Modeling the forces of cutting with scissors.

Authors:  Mohsen Mahvash; Liming M Voo; Diana Kim; Kristin Jeung; Joshua Wainer; Allison M Okamura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Development of the VBLaST: a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer.

Authors:  Anderson Maciel; Youquan Liu; Woojin Ahn; T Paul Singh; Ward Dunnican; Suvranu De
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  Building an efficient surgical team using a bench model simulation: construct validity of the Legacy Inanimate System for Endoscopic Team Training (LISETT).

Authors:  B Zheng; P M Denk; D V Martinec; P Gatta; M H Whiteford; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends.

Authors:  David M Irby; LuAnn Wilkerson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The importance of organ geometry and boundary constraints for planning of medical interventions.

Authors:  S Misra; K J Macura; K T Ramesh; A M Okamura
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Development and validation of assessment measures for a newly developed physical examination simulator.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Patricia Youngblood
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.