Literature DB >> 9124632

Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

R Reznick1, G Regehr, H MacRae, J Martin, W McCulloch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new approach to testing operative technical skills, the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), formally assesses discrete segments of surgical tasks using bench model simulations. This study examines the interstation reliability and construct validity of a large-scale administration of the OSATS.
METHODS: A 2-hour, eight-station OSATS was administered to 48 general surgery residents. Residents were assessed at each station by one of 48 surgeons who evaluated the resident using two methods of scoring: task-specific checklists and global rating scales.
RESULTS: Interstation reliability was 0.78 for the checklist score, and 0.85 for the global score. Analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of training for both the checklist score, F(3,44) = 20.08, P <0.001, and the global score, F(3,44) = 24.63, P <0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: The OSATS demonstrates high reliability and construct validity, suggesting that we can effectively measure residents' technical ability outside the operating room using bench model simulations.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9124632     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)89597-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  177 in total

1.  Assessment of surgical competence.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Mackay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

2.  Presidential Address: Surgical education in the third millennium.

Authors:  A Peracchia
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Motion analysis.

Authors:  S G T Smith; J Torkington; T J Brown; N J Taffinder; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A new surgical trainer (BOPT) improves skill transfer for anastomotic techniques in gastrointestinal surgery into the operating room: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Johannes C Lauscher; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Andrea Stroux; Heinz J Buhr; Jörn Gröne
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Determinants of competency judgments by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  G L Adrales; M B Donnelly; U B Chu; D B Witzke; J D Hoskins; M J Mastrangelo; A Gandsas; A E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Mackay; P Morgan; V Datta; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.

Authors:  J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.