Literature DB >> 9114900

Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents.

H Faulkner1, G Regehr, J Martin, R Reznick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the concurrent validity of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), a new test of technical skill for general surgery residents.
METHOD: Twelve residents (six in their senior, or fifth, year and six in their junior, or third, year) at the University of Toronto in 1994-95 were ranked within level of training according to their OSATS marks and by surgical faculty. Correspondence between OSATS and faculty rankings was assessed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: The correlations between test scores and faculty rankings were generally high for the senior residents but low for the junior residents.
CONCLUSION: Scores on the OSATS accurately reflect the independent opinions of faculty regarding the technical skills of senior residents, suggesting that it is a valid measure of technical skill for these individuals. The scores did not, however, reproduce faculty rankings of the junior residents. Whether this was a failing of the OSATS or the faculty rankings requires further study.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9114900     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199612000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  60 in total

1.  Assessment of surgical competence.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Mackay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

2.  Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Smith; N Taffinder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

3.  Surveillance of surgical training by detailed electronic registration of logical components.

Authors:  A Tøttrup
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.

Authors:  J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Multiple Objective Measures of Skill (MOMS): a new approach to the assessment of technical ability in surgical trainees.

Authors:  Sean Mackay; Vivek Datta; Avril Chang; Jyoti Shah; Roger Kneebone; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Teaching cognitive skills improves learning in surgical skills courses: a blinded, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Julie A Kohls-Gatzoulis; Glenn Regehr; Carol Hutchison
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Analysis of errors in laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Authors:  N E Seymour; A G Gallagher; S A Roman; M K O'Brien; D K Andersen; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Evaluating pain education programs: an integrated approach.

Authors:  Adam Dubrowski; Marie-Paule Morin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Electronic device for endosurgical skills training (EDEST): study of reliability.

Authors:  J B Pagador; J Uson; M A Sánchez; J L Moyano; J Moreno; P Bustos; J Mateos; F M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 10.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.