Literature DB >> 9716762

A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills.

J Y Chung1, J M Sackier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this paper, we explored a quick and inexpensive method to evaluate the improvement in laparoscopic skills gained by residents after attending a formal training course in laparoscopy.
METHODS: Surgical residents attending an endoscopic workshop were randomly selected to perform tasks in a training simulator. Each was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively before and after the workshop. A control group of six residents who did not attend the workshop were selected to perform the same tasks twice in succession.
RESULTS: The total mean time improvement for all tasks in the study group was 34.3% and in the control group 7.3% (p = 0.0001). When the data was separated for each task, statistically significant improvement was demonstrated in five of the six tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: Residents who attend a formal workshop in endoscopy can gain significant improvement in skills. The methods described in this study can be used to quantitatively measure this improvement throughout a resident's training.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9716762     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

Review 1.  The role of simulation in surgical training.

Authors:  J Torkington; S G Smith; B I Rees; A Darzi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery.

Authors:  D A Rogers; A S Elstein; G Bordage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Short-term sleep deficits do not adversely affect acquisition of laparoscopic skills in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  A Jensen; R Milner; C Fisher; J Gaughan; R Rolandelli; H Grewal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Novice surgeons versus experienced surgeons in laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery: a comparison of performances in a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Leonidas Alevizos; Willem Brinkman; Abe Fingerhut; Jack Jakimowicz; Emmanuel Leandros
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A simple scoring system to train surgeons in basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Gregory Shepherd; Dirk von Delft; Johannes Truck; Rainer Kubiak; Khaled Ashour; Hugh Grant
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Validation of a six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M Uchal; Y Raftopoulos; J Tjugum; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of cognitive imaging and sex differences on the development of laparoscopic suturing skills.

Authors:  Tyrone Donnon; Jean-Gaston DesCôteaux; Claudio Violato
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  The impact of laparoscopic bariatric workshops on the practice patterns of surgeons.

Authors:  J L Lord; D R Cottam; R M Dallal; S G Mattar; A R Watson; J M Glasscock; R Ramanathan; G M Eid; P R Schauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.