Literature DB >> 18582855

Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.

Meghan Clayards1, Michael K Tanenhaus, Richard N Aslin, Robert A Jacobs.   

Abstract

Listeners are exquisitely sensitive to fine-grained acoustic detail within phonetic categories for sounds and words. Here we show that this sensitivity is optimal given the probabilistic nature of speech cues. We manipulated the probability distribution of one probabilistic cue, voice onset time (VOT), which differentiates word initial labial stops in English (e.g., "beach" and "peach"). Participants categorized words from distributions of VOT with wide or narrow variances. Uncertainty about word identity was measured by four-alternative forced-choice judgments and by the probability of looks to pictures. Both measures closely reflected the posterior probability of the word given the likelihood distributions of VOT, suggesting that listeners are sensitive to these distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18582855      PMCID: PMC2582186          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  21 in total

1.  Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics. I. Analysis.

Authors:  Johan Wouters; Michael W Macon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

Review 3.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Sheila E Blumstein; Emily B Myers; Jesse Rissman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.

Authors:  C Fougeron; P A Keating
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Jeffrey Tash
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1974

8.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

9.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.

Authors:  J E Andruski; S E Blumstein; M Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-09

10.  Optimal predictions in everyday cognition.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09
View more
  93 in total

1.  Perceptual learning evidence for contextually-specific representations.

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-21

2.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Seeking predictions from a predictive framework.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Victor Ferreira
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Speech categorization develops slowly through adolescence.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ani Danelz; Hannah Rigler; Michael Seedorff
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  Sociolinguistic Perception as Inference Under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; Kodi Weatherholtz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

9.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

10.  Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.

Authors:  Ran Liu; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.