Literature DB >> 20649236

Phonetic enhancement of sibilants in infant-directed speech.

Alejandrina Cristià1.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that vocalic categories are enhanced in infant-directed speech (IDS) has received a great deal of attention and support. In contrast, work focusing on the acoustic implementation of consonantal categories has been scarce, and positive, negative, and null results have been reported. However, interpreting this mixed evidence is complicated by the facts that the definition of phonetic enhancement varies across articles, that small and heterogeneous groups have been studied across experiments, and further that the categories chosen are likely affected by other characteristics of IDS. Here, an analysis of the English sibilants /s/ and /[see text]/ in a large corpus of caregivers' speech to another adult and to their infant suggests that consonantal categories are indeed enhanced, even after controlling for typical IDS prosodic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649236      PMCID: PMC3188599          DOI: 10.1121/1.3436529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Statistical properties of infant-directed versus adult-directed speech: insights from speech recognition.

Authors:  Katrin Kirchhoff; Steven Schimmel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; F Lacerda; K N Stevens; B Lindblom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Speech to infants as hyperspeech: knowledge-driven processes in early word recognition.

Authors:  A Fernald
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2000 Apr-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Speech perception in infants.

Authors:  P D Eimas; E R Siqueland; P Jusczyk; J Vigorito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

7.  Age-related changes in acoustic modifications of Mandarin maternal speech to preverbal infants and five-year-old children: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Huei-Mei Liu; Feng-Ming Tsao; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2009-02-23

8.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-03

10.  Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Quantitative Linguistic Predictors of Infants' Learning of Specific English Words.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley; Colman Humphrey
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Fine-grained variation in caregivers' /s/ predicts their infants' /s/ category.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A meta-analysis of the predictability of LENA™ automated measures for child language development.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Rondeline Williams; Laura Dilley; Derek M Houston
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2020-06-11

4.  Phonetic modification of vowel space in storybook speech to infants up to 2 years of age.

Authors:  Evamarie B Burnham; Elizabeth A Wieland; Maria V Kondaurova; J Devin McAuley; Tonya R Bergeson; Laura C Dilley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of the acoustic features of infant-directed speech.

Authors:  Christopher Cox; Christina Bergmann; Emma Fowler; Tamar Keren-Portnoy; Andreas Roepstorff; Greg Bryant; Riccardo Fusaroli
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-10-03

6.  Infant-Directed Speech Enhances Attention to Speech in Deaf Infants With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Tonya R Bergeson; Derek M Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Motherese in interaction: at the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (A systematic review).

Authors:  Catherine Saint-Georges; Mohamed Chetouani; Raquel Cassel; Fabio Apicella; Ammar Mahdhaoui; Filippo Muratori; Marie-Christine Laznik; David Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lexical Repetition Properties of Caregiver Speech and Language Development in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Jongmin Jung; Tonya R Bergeson; Derek M Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Vocalic Intrusions in Consonant Clusters in Child-Directed vs. Adult-Directed Speech.

Authors:  Nina Gram Garmann; Pernille Hansen; Hanne Gram Simonsen; Elisabeth Holm; Eirik Tengesdal; Brechtje Post; Elinor Payne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.