Literature DB >> 22225051

Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Ann E Todd1, Jan R Edwards, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

Speech production by children with cochlear implants (CIs) is generally less intelligible and less accurate on a phonemic level than that of normally hearing children. Research has reported that children with CIs produce less acoustic contrast between phonemes than normally hearing children, but these studies have included correct and incorrect productions. The present study compared the extent of contrast between correct productions of /s/ and /∫/ by children with CIs and two comparison groups: (1) normally hearing children of the same chronological age as the children with CIs and (2) normally hearing children with the same duration of auditory experience. Spectral peaks and means were calculated from the frication noise of productions of /s/ and /∫/. Results showed that the children with CIs produced less contrast between /s/ and /∫/ than normally hearing children of the same chronological age and normally hearing children with the same duration of auditory experience due to production of /s/ with spectral peaks and means at lower frequencies. The results indicate that there may be differences between the speech sounds produced by children with CIs and their normally hearing peers even for sounds that adults judge as correct.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22225051      PMCID: PMC3253598          DOI: 10.1121/1.3652852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Development of speech perception and production in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Liat Kishon-Rabin; Riki Taitelbaum; Chava Muchnik; Inbal Gehtler; Jona Kronenberg; Minka Hildesheimer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

2.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing.

Authors:  Steven B Chin; Patrick L Tsai; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  The relative importance of amplitude, temporal, and spectral cues for cochlear implant processor design.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts.

Authors:  Harlan Lane; Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Stockmann; Mark Tiede; Jennell Vick; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Acoustic and spectral characteristics of young children's fricative productions: a developmental perspective.

Authors:  Shawn L Nissen; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spoken word recognition in toddlers who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Jenny R Saffran; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009

10.  Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments.

Authors:  S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  A comparison of spectral estimation methods for the analysis of sibilant fricatives.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral dynamics of sibilant fricatives are contrastive and language specific.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quantifying robustness of the /t/-/k/ contrast using a single, static spectral feature.

Authors:  Allison A Johnson; Patrick F Reidy; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Alveolar and Postalveolar Voiceless Fricative and Affricate Productions of Spanish-English Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Ferenc Bunta; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy; Kayla Kristensen; Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Perception-Production Links in Children's Speech.

Authors:  Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Quantifying the Robustness of the English Sibilant Fricative Contrast in Children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Holliday; Patrick F Reidy; Mary E Beckman; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The effect of differential listening experience on the development of expressive and receptive language in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christi Hess; Cynthia Zettler-Greeley; Shelly P Godar; Susan Ellis-Weismer; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Does Early Phonetic Differentiation Predict Later Phonetic Development? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study of /ɹ/ Development in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Mara K Logerquist; Hyuna Kim; Alisha Martell; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.