Literature DB >> 11294236

Representation of visuotactile space in the split brain.

C Spence1, A Kingstone, D I Shore, M S Gazzaniga.   

Abstract

Recent neurophysiological research in the monkey has revealed bimodal neuronal cells with both tactile receptive fields on the hand and visual receptive fields that follow the hands as they move, suggesting the existence of a bimodal map of visuotactile space. Using a cross-modal congruency task, we examined the representation of visuotactile space in normal people and in a split-brain patient (J. W.) as the right arm assumed different postures. The results showed that the congruency effects from distracting lights followed the hand around in space in normal people, but failed to do so in the split-brain patient when the hand crossed the midline. This suggests that cross-cortical connections are required to remap visual space to the current hand position when the hand crosses the midline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294236     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  25 in total

1.  Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans.

Authors:  Vera U Ludwig; Ikuma Adachi; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time.

Authors:  David I Shore; Nevena Simic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Yota Kimura; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Mapping reflexive shifts of attention in eye-centered and hand-centered coordinate systems.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emiliano Macaluso; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Daniele Romano; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.