Literature DB >> 15460924

Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.

Yuka Igarashi1, Norimichi Kitagawa, Shigeru Ichihara.   

Abstract

The participants in this study discriminated the position of tactile target stimuli presented at the tip or the base of the forefinger of one of the participants' hands, while ignoring visual distractor stimuli. The visual distractor stimuli were presented from two circles on a display aligned with the tactile targets in Experiment 1 or orthogonal to them in Experiment 2. Tactile discrimination performance was slower and less accurate when the visual distractor stimuli were presented from incongruent locations relative to the tactile target stimuli (e.g., tactile target at the base of the finger with top visual distractor) highlighting a cross-modal congruency effect. We examined whether the presence and orientation of a simple line drawing of a hand, which was superimposed on the visual distractor stimuli, would modulate the cross-modal congruency effects. When the tactile targets and the visual distractors were spatially aligned, the modulatory effects of the hand picture were small (Experiment 1). However, when they were spatially misaligned, the effects were much larger, and the direction of the cross-modal congruency effects changed in accordance with the orientation of the picture of the hand, as if the hand picture corresponded to the participants' own stimulated hand (Experiment 2). The results suggest that the two-dimensional picture of a hand can modulate processes maintaining our internal body representation. We also observed that the cross-modal congruency effects were influenced by the postures of the stimulated and the responding hands. These results reveal the complex nature of spatial interactions among vision, touch, and proprioception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15460924     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  28 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

2.  Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

Authors:  S P Tipper; N Phillips; C Dancer; D Lloyd; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

4.  Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Angelica Ronald; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

5.  Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Donna M Lloyd; David I Shore; Charles Spence; Gemma A Calvert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space.

Authors:  Elisabetta La'davas
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Seeing or not seeing where your hands are.

Authors:  E Làdavas; A Farnè; G Zeloni; G di Pellegrino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09
View more
  8 in total

1.  The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Yota Kimura; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual presentation of hand image modulates visuo-tactile temporal order judgment.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect.

Authors:  Norimichi Kitagawa; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multisensory temporal processing in own-body contexts: plausibility of hand ownership does not improve visuo-tactile asynchrony detection.

Authors:  Robert T Keys; Anina N Rich; Regine Zopf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration.

Authors:  Sophie Smit; Anina N Rich; Regine Zopf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Those are Your Legs: The Effect of Visuo-Spatial Viewpoint on Visuo-Tactile Integration and Body Ownership.

Authors:  Polona Pozeg; Giulia Galli; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.