Literature DB >> 22143791

Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans.

Vera U Ludwig1, Ikuma Adachi, Tetsuro Matsuzawa.   

Abstract

Humans share implicit preferences for certain cross-sensory combinations; for example, they consistently associate higher-pitched sounds with lighter colors, smaller size, and spikier shapes. In the condition of synesthesia, people may experience such cross-modal correspondences to a perceptual degree (e.g., literally seeing sounds). So far, no study has addressed the question whether nonhuman animals share cross-modal correspondences as well. To establish the evolutionary origins of cross-modal mappings, we tested whether chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) also associate higher pitch with higher luminance. Thirty-three humans and six chimpanzees were required to classify black and white squares according to their color while hearing irrelevant background sounds that were either high-pitched or low-pitched. Both species performed better when the background sound was congruent (high-pitched for white, low-pitched for black) than when it was incongruent (low-pitched for white, high-pitched for black). An inherent tendency to pair high pitch with high luminance hence evolved before the human lineage split from that of chimpanzees. Rather than being a culturally learned or a linguistic phenomenon, this mapping constitutes a basic feature of the primate sensory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143791      PMCID: PMC3251154          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112605108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Sound-colour synaesthesia: to what extent does it use cross-modal mechanisms common to us all?

Authors:  Jamie Ward; Brett Huckstep; Elias Tsakanikos
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  THE ORIGIN OF LANGUAGE.

Authors:  E L Thorndike
Journal:  Science       Date:  1943-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers.

Authors:  Claudio Brozzoli; Masami Ishihara; Silke M Göbel; Roméo Salemme; Yves Rossetti; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spontaneous voice-face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans.

Authors:  Julia Sliwa; Jean-René Duhamel; Olivier Pascalis; Sylvia Wirth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Early visual deprivation impairs multisensory interactions in humans.

Authors:  Lisa Putzar; Ines Goerendt; Kathrin Lange; Frank Rösler; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Synesthesia-like mappings of lightness, pitch, and melodic interval.

Authors:  T L Hubbard
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1996

Review 8.  Synesthesia: a new approach to understanding the development of perception.

Authors:  Ferrinne Spector; Daphne Maurer
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2009-01

9.  Matching vocalizations to vocalizing faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Akihiro Izumi; Shozo Kojima
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor.

Authors:  L E Marks; R J Hammeal; M H Bornstein
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1987
View more
  38 in total

1.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Asymmetries of the parietal operculum in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in relation to handedness for tool use.

Authors:  Emmanuel P Gilissen; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Anne-Sylvie Crisinel; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 6.  The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution.

Authors:  Mutsumi Imai; Sotaro Kita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages.

Authors:  Damián E Blasi; Søren Wichmann; Harald Hammarström; Peter F Stadler; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

9.  Naturally together: pitch-height and brightness as coupled factors for eliciting the SMARC effect in non-musicians.

Authors:  Marco Pitteri; Mauro Marchetti; Konstantinos Priftis; Massimo Grassi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Audio-visual crossmodal correspondences in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  A T Korzeniowska; H Root-Gutteridge; J Simner; D Reby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.