Literature DB >> 16086142

Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time.

David I Shore1, Nevena Simic.   

Abstract

In a visuotactile congruency task, a distracting flash of light presented near a tactile target can influence speeded judgments of tactile location. Localization of the tactile target is more rapid when the elevation of the visual distractor is congruent with the tactile stimulus than when it is incongruent. The goal of the present study was to examine the degree of control that can be exerted on the process proposed to integrate the visual and tactile stimuli. To this end, the proportion of spatially congruent items was manipulated across blocks of trials. A robust congruency effect was observed across three experiments. There was no effect of proportion congruency (varied between 75 and 11% congruent) when the visual event was presented only 30 ms prior to the tactile event. When this lead-time was increased to 100 ms there was a significant increase in the congruency effect, for errors, in the high proportion congruent conditions (experiment 3). We conclude that with sufficient lead-time, top-down influence can be exerted in this task, however, when presented at near simultaneity, visuotactile integration is independent of top-down effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16086142     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2391-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Jon Driver
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.

Authors:  J Tzelgov; A Henik; J Berger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

4.  Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Donna M Lloyd; David I Shore; Charles Spence; Gemma A Calvert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course.

Authors:  H E Egeth; S Yantis
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields.

Authors:  M S Graziano; C G Gross
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

9.  Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Diane Swick; And U Turken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Multisensory temporal order judgments: the role of hemispheric redundancy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; David I Shore; Charles Spence
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mozolic; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Collision error avoidance: influence of proportion congruency and sensorimotor memory on open-loop grasp control.

Authors:  Ryan Brydges; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Enea F Pavone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Physiological and anatomical evidence for multisensory interactions in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Victoria M Bajo; Israel Nelken; Andrew J King
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Cross-modal stimulus conflict: the behavioral effects of stimulus input timing in a visual-auditory Stroop task.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Christina J Park; Kenneth C Roberts; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When irrelevant information helps: Extending the Eriksen-flanker task into a multisensory world.

Authors:  Simon Merz; Christian Frings; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.