Literature DB >> 17726605

The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.

Yuka Igarashi1, Yota Kimura, Charles Spence, Shigeru Ichihara.   

Abstract

Seeing one's own body (either directly or indirectly) can influence visuotactile crossmodal interactions. Previously, it has been shown that even viewing a simple line drawing of a hand can also modulate such crossmodal interactions, as if viewing the picture of a hand somehow primes the representation of one's own hand. However, factors other than the sight of a symbolic picture of a hand may have modulated the crossmodal interactions reported in previous research. In the present study, we examined the crossmodal modulatory effects of viewing five different visual images (photograph of a hand, line drawing of a hand, line drawing of a car, an U-shape, and an ellipse) on tactile performance. Participants made speeded discrimination responses regarding the location of brief vibrotactile targets presented to either the tip or base of their left index finger, while trying to ignore visual distractors presented to either the left or right of central fixation. We compared the visuotactile congruency effects elicited when the five different visual images were presented superimposed over the visual distractors. Participants' tactile discrimination performance was modulated to a significantly greater extent by viewing the photograph of a hand than when viewing the outline drawing of a hand. No such crossmodal congruency effects were reported in any of the other conditions. These results therefore suggest that visuotactile interactions are specifically modulated by the image of the hand rather than just by any simple orientation cues that may be provided by the image of a hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726605     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1076-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

Authors:  S P Tipper; N Phillips; C Dancer; D Lloyd; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-08

3.  Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Angelica Ronald; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

4.  Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.

Authors:  David I Shore; Morgan E Barnes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Self-attributed body-shadows modulate tactile attention.

Authors:  Francesco Pavani; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-07-12

6.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands.

Authors:  K Sekiyama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

8.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

9.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; G J DiGirolamo; W L Thompson; N M Alpert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Spatial orienting of tactile attention induced by social cues.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Scott Sinnett; Agnès Alsius; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness.

Authors:  Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  TMS of posterior parietal cortex disrupts visual tactile multisensory integration.

Authors:  Siavash Pasalar; Tony Ro; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Neural substrates of reliability-weighted visual-tactile multisensory integration.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Siavash Pasalar; Tony Ro
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23

Review 6.  The multisensory body revealed through its cast shadows.

Authors:  Francesco Pavani; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-19

7.  Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration.

Authors:  Sophie Smit; Anina N Rich; Regine Zopf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Keeping in touch with one's self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness.

Authors:  Jane E Aspell; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.