Literature DB >> 22760584

Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.

Mary Kim Ngo1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

When identifying a rapidly masked visual target display in a stream of visual distractor displays, a high-frequency tone (presented in synchrony with the target display) in a stream of low-tone distractors results in better performance than when the same low tone accompanies each visual display (Ngo and Spence in Atten Percept Psychophys 72:1938-1947, 2010; Vroomen and de Gelder in J Exp Psychol Hum 26:1583-1590, 2000). In the present study, we tested three oddball conditions: a louder tone presented amongst quieter tones, a quieter tone presented amongst louder tones, and the absence of a tone, within an otherwise identical tone sequence. Across three experiments, all three oddball conditions resulted in the crossmodal facilitation of participants' visual target identification performance. These results therefore suggest that salient oddball stimuli in the form of deviating tones, when synchronized with the target, may be sufficient to capture participants' attention and facilitate visual target identification. The fact that the absence of a sound in an otherwise-regular sequence of tones also facilitated performance suggests that multisensory integration cannot provide an adequate account for the 'freezing' effect. Instead, an attentional capture account is proposed to account for the benefits of oddball cuing in Vroomen and de Gelder's task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22760584     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3153-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Time course of attention effects with abrupt-onset and offset single- and multiple-element precues.

Authors:  G Chastain; M Cheal
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1999

2.  Sound enhances visual perception: cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision.

Authors:  J Vroomen; B de Gelder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: can the data get lost in the map?

Authors:  John G Neuhoff; Gregory Kramer; Joseph Wayand
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2002-03

4.  The duration of a brief event in the mind's eye.

Authors:  J T Enns; J C Brehaut; D I Shore
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1999-10

5.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; James Intriligator; Josée Rivest; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

Review 6.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2007-11

7.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Perceptual bias for rising tones.

Authors:  J G Neuhoff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.

Authors:  Carles Escera; Maria Jose Corral; Elena Yago
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment.

Authors:  Julia Föcker; Polly Atkins; Foivos-Christos Vantzos; Maximilian Wilhelm; Thomas Schenk; Hauke S Meyerhoff
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Comparison of auditory and visual oddball fMRI in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Azurii K Collier; Daniel H Wolf; Jeffrey N Valdez; Bruce I Turetsky; Mark A Elliott; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  On the 'visual' in 'audio-visual integration': a hypothesis concerning visual pathways.

Authors:  Philip Jaekl; Alexis Pérez-Bellido; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sounds can boost the awareness of visual events through attention without cross-modal integration.

Authors:  Márta Szabina Pápai; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.