Literature DB >> 19949489

Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.

Carlos F Aparicio1, William M Baum.   

Abstract

To examine extended control over local choice, the present study investigated preference in transition as food-rate ratio provided by two levers changed across seven components within daily sessions, and food-amount ratio changed across phases. Phase 1 arranged a food-amount ratio of 4:1 (i.e., the left lever delivered four pellets and the right lever one pellet); Phase 2 reversed the food-amount ratio to 1:4, and in Phase 3 the food-amount ratio was 3:2. At a relatively extended time scale, preference was described well by a linear relation between log response ratio and log rate ratio (the generalized matching law). A small amount of carryover occurred from one rate ratio to the next but disappeared after four food deliveries. Estimates of sensitivity to food-amount ratio were around 1.0 and were independent of rate ratio. Analysis across food deliveries within rate-ratio components showed that the effect of a small amount was diminished by the presence of a large amount-that is, when a larger amount was present in the situation (three or four pellets), the value of a small amount (one or two pellets) became paltry. More local analysis of visits to the levers between food deliveries showed that postfood visits following a large amount were disproportionately longer than following a small amount. Continuing food deliveries from the same source tended to make visits less dependent on relative amount, but a discontinuation (i.e., food from the other lever) reinstated dependence on relative amount. Analysis at a still smaller time scale revealed preference pulses following food deliveries that confirmed the tendency toward dependence on absolute amount with continuing deliveries, and toward dependence on relative amount following discontinuations. A mathematical model based on a linear-operator equation accounts for many of the results. The larger and longer preference following a switch to a larger amount is consistent with the idea that local preference depends on relatively extended variables even on short time scales.

Keywords:  choice; dynamics; food amount; food rate; matching law; preference pulse; rats

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19949489      PMCID: PMC2677563          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  32 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Optimality And Concurrent Variable-interval Variable-ratio Schedules.

Authors:  W Baum; C Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Local effects of delayed food.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.

Authors:  Andrew M Rodewald; Christine E Hughes; Raymond C Pitts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Editorial: choice studies in transition.

Authors:  J Jozefowiez; J J McDowell; J E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  What Counts as Behavior? The Molar Multiscale View.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

7.  Deviation from the matching law reflects an optimal strategy involving learning over multiple timescales.

Authors:  Kiyohito Iigaya; Yashar Ahmadian; Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; Yonatan Loewenstein; William T Newsome; Stefano Fusi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.

Authors:  Denis O'Hora; Rick Dale; Petri T Piiroinen; Fionnuala Connolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.