Literature DB >> 23949926

Applicability to foraging simulation of a reinforcement schedule controlling the response energy of pigeons.

Masanori Kono1.   

Abstract

In optimal foraging theory (OFT), energy expenditure is an important variable for predicting foraging behavior. However, early studies, including operant simulations of foraging, did not measure energy expenditure. In the present study, an adjusting energy (AE) schedule was developed to control energy expenditure. Interresponse energy (IRE), a measure of the energy expenditure during a response, was calculated by dividing the square of the elapsed time between two consecutive responses by the square of the straight-line distance between the locations of the same two responses. An adjusting procedure was employed to estimate the indifference point between the requirements of the AE schedule and a fixed ratio (FR) schedule, which has been used in many operant simulations. In the adjusting procedure, pigeons adjusted the requirement of the AE schedule to that of the FR schedule. The results showed a systematic relationship between the requirements of the AE and FR schedules. Moreover, the total IRE per reinforcement systematically increased with the AE requirement. Thus, the present study demonstrates the utility of the AE schedule as a procedure for testing the validity of OFT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23949926      PMCID: PMC3840284          DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0117-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  7 in total

1.  Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Energetic and motor responses to increasing force requirements.

Authors:  S H Mitchell; J Brener
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-04

3.  Comparing Locomotion With Lever-press Travel In An Operant Simulation Of Foraging.

Authors:  C Aparicio; W Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and foraging.

Authors:  N Abarca; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  The barrier choice paradigm: haloperidol reduces sensitivity to reinforcement.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columbia livia) are sensitive to the distance to food, but only rats request more food when distance increases.

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Lauren C Kettle; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 1.777

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of a touchscreen apparatus for operant research with pigeons.

Authors:  Forrest Toegel; Cory Toegel; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.215

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.