Literature DB >> 15478431

Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?

M C Liberman1, Jian Zuo, J J Guinan.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) evoked by low-level tones are a sensitive indicator of outer hair cell (OHC) function. High-level DPOAEs are less vulnerable to cochlear insult, and their dependence on the OHC function is more controversial. Here, the mechanism underlying high-level DPOAE generation is addressed using a mutant mouse line lacking prestin, the molecular motor driving OHC somatic motility, required for cochlear amplification. With prestin deletion, attenuated DPOAEs were measurable at high sound levels. DPOAE thresholds were shifted by approximately 50 dB, matching the loss of cochlear amplifier gain measured in compound action potentials. In contrast, at high sound levels, distortion products in the cochlear microphonic (CM) of mutants were not decreased re wildtypes (expressed re CM at the primaries). Distortion products in both CM and otoacoustic emissions disappeared rapidly after death. The results show that OHC somatic motility is not necessary for the production of DPOAEs at high SPLs. They also suggest that the small, physiologically vulnerable DPOAE that remains without prestin-based motility is due directly to the mechanical nonlinearity associated with stereociliary transduction, and that this stereocilia mechanical nonlinearity is robustly coupled to the motion of the cochlear partition to the extent that it can drive the middle ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15478431      PMCID: PMC1805783          DOI: 10.1121/1.1775275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.

Authors:  Paul Avan; Pierre Bonfils; Laurent Gilain; Thierry Mom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast adaptation of mechanoelectrical transducer channels in mammalian cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  Helen J Kennedy; Michael G Evans; Andrew C Crawford; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Hearing threshold elevation precedes hair-cell loss in prestin knockout mice.

Authors:  Xudong Wu; Jiangang Gao; Yunkai Guo; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-05

4.  Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells.

Authors:  P Dallos; M A Cheatham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  W E Brownell; C R Bader; D Bertrand; Y de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ionic basis of the receptor potential in a vertebrate hair cell.

Authors:  D P Corey; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  CM tuning can be compatible with sharply tuned receptor potentials.

Authors:  E J Kletsky; J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures.

Authors:  David M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf--a bifurcation--is better than none.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; Frank Jülicher; Pascal Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Cochlear function in mice with only one copy of the prestin gene.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; J Zheng; K H Huynh; G G Du; J Gao; J Zuo; E Navarrete; P Dallos
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Long-term effects of acoustic trauma on electrically evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kirin Halsey; Karen Fegelman; Yehoash Raphael; Karl Grosh; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-28

6.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Electromotility in outer hair cells: a supporting role for fast potassium conductance.

Authors:  Mark Ospeck; Xiao-Xia Dong; Jie Fang; Kuni H Iwasa
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.538

8.  Conservation of hearing by simultaneous mutation of Na,K-ATPase and NKCC1.

Authors:  Rodney C Diaz; Ana Elena Vazquez; Hongwei Dou; Dongguang Wei; Emma Lou Cardell; Jerry Lingrel; Gary E Shull; Karen Jo Doyle; Ebenezer N Yamoah
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-08-04

9.  The dimensions and composition of stereociliary rootlets in mammalian cochlear hair cells: comparison between high- and low-frequency cells and evidence for a connection to the lateral membrane.

Authors:  David N Furness; Shanthini Mahendrasingam; Mitsuru Ohashi; Robert Fettiplace; Carole M Hackney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.