Literature DB >> 22160753

Sound-evoked olivocochlear activation in unanesthetized mice.

Anna R Chambers1,2, Kenneth E Hancock3,4, Stéphane F Maison3,4, M Charles Liberman3,4, Daniel B Polley3,5,4.   

Abstract

Genetic tools available for the mouse make it a powerful model to study the modulation of cochlear function by descending control systems. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitude by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) provides a robust tool for noninvasively monitoring the strength of descending modulation, yet investigations in mice have been performed infrequently and only under anesthesia, a condition likely to reduce olivocochlear activation. Here, we characterize the contralateral olivocochlear reflex in the alert, unanesthetized mouse. Head-fixed mice were restrained between two closed acoustic systems, while an artifact rejection protocol minimized contamination from self-generated sounds and movements. In mice anesthetized with pentobarbital, ketamine or urethane, CAS at 80 dB SPL evoked, on average, a <1-dB change in DPOAE amplitude. In contrast, the mean CAS-induced DPOAE suppression in unanesthetized mice was nearly 8 dB. Experiments in mice with targeted deletion of the α9 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor confirmed the contribution of the medial olivocochlear efferents to this phenomenon. These findings demonstrate the utility of the CAS assay in the unanesthetized mouse and highlight the adverse effects of anesthesia when probing the functional status of descending control pathways within the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22160753      PMCID: PMC3298614          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0306-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  53 in total

1.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects on cochlear responses of activation of descending pathways from the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W H Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of olivocochlear feedback on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig.

Authors:  S G Kujawa; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-09

4.  Evidence for a cortically mediated release from inhibition in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ashley W Harkrider; C Dane Bowers
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation.

Authors:  Simon Henin; Suzanne Thompson; Shukrallah Abdelrazeq; Glenis R Long
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stimulus-specific adaptation in the gerbil primary auditory thalamus is the result of a fast frequency-specific habituation and is regulated by the corticofugal system.

Authors:  Peter Bäuerle; Wolfger von der Behrens; Manfred Kössl; Bernhard H Gaese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The medial olivocochlear system attenuates the developmental impact of early noise exposure.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Bradford J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-23

8.  Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength.

Authors:  S F Maison; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Olivocochlear efferent control in sound localization and experience-dependent learning.

Authors:  Samuel Irving; David R Moore; M Charles Liberman; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The descending corticocollicular pathway mediates learning-induced auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Victoria M Bajo; Fernando R Nodal; David R Moore; Andrew J King
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  35 in total

1.  Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; Douglas E Vetter; A Bélen Elgoyhen; Steven A Thomas; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  M D Valero; J A Burton; S N Hauser; T A Hackett; R Ramachandran; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Cristian Aedo; Alex León; Macarena Bowen; Natalia Jara; Gonzalo Terreros; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07

Review 5.  All the way from the cortex: a review of auditory corticosubcollicular pathways.

Authors:  Enrique Saldaña
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  Hair cell and neural contributions to the cochlear summating potential.

Authors:  Andrew K Pappa; Kendall A Hutson; William C Scott; J David Wilson; Kevin E Fox; Maheer M Masood; Christopher K Giardina; Stephen H Pulver; Gilberto D Grana; Charles Askew; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex vs. auditory brainstem response for hearing assessment.

Authors:  R J Longenecker; F Alghamdi; M J Rosen; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.

Authors:  Ioan A Lina; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.