Literature DB >> 11214025

Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.

K P Klatt1, J A Sherman, J B Sheldon.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of deprivation on engagement in activities for 3 adult men with developmental disabilities. First, an assessment was conducted to identify a high- and a low-preference activity for each participant. Second, the high-preference activity was made available following three amounts of deprivation of the activity (15 min, 2 hr, and 1 to 4 days); the low-preference activity was made available following the schedule of deprivation that produced the highest level of engagement by each participant in the high-preference activity. The results were that 1 to 4 days of deprivation produced the highest average amounts of engagement in the high-preference activity for each participant; this amount of deprivation did not produce high engagement in the low-preference activities. Third, the deprivation procedures and results were replicated when high-preference activities were presented by teachers during the participants' daily activities when their engagement had been quite low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11214025      PMCID: PMC1284273          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  8 in total

1.  The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.

Authors:  J M Gottschalk; M E Libby; R B Graff
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer.

Authors:  J L GEWIRTZ; D M BAER
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1958-01

3.  Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors.

Authors:  R H Horner; H M Day; J R Day
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Antecedent influences on behavior disorders.

Authors:  R G Smith; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

5.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

6.  Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.

Authors:  D H Barlow; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979

7.  What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?

Authors:  R Eisenberger; M Karpman; J Trattner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-07

8.  Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991
  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior.

Authors:  Mark O'Reilly; Russell Lang; Tonya Davis; Mandy Rispoli; Wendy Machalicek; Jeff Sigafoos; Giulio Lancioni; Robert Didden
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

3.  Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

4.  Telehealth Delivery of Function-Based Behavioral Treatment for Problem Behaviors Exhibited by Boys with Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Katerina D Monlux; Joy S Pollard; Arlette Y Bujanda Rodriguez; Scott S Hall
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-06

5.  The effects of deprivation, presession exposure, and preferences on teaching manding to children with autism.

Authors:  Ellie C Hartman; Kevin P Klatt
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2005

6.  Analysis of response allocation in individuals with multiple forms of stereotyped behavior.

Authors:  John T Rapp; Timothy R Vollmer; Claire St Peter; Claudia L Dozier; Nicole M Cotnoir
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

7.  The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.

Authors:  David B McAdam; Kevin P Klatt; Mikhail Koffarnus; Anthony Dicesare; Katherine Solberg; Cassie Welch; Sean Murphy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

Review 8.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.