Literature DB >> 10738955

The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.

J M Gottschalk1, M E Libby, R B Graff.   

Abstract

Preference assessments were conducted for 4 individuals with developmental disabilities across conditions of (a) control, allowing equal access to all stimuli prior to the preference assessment; (b) deprivation, allowing no access to one stimulus for 48 hr prior to the assessment; and (c) satiation, allowing free access to one stimulus for 10 min immediately prior to the assessment. Deprivation resulted in increased preference, whereas satiation resulted in decreased preference compared to control conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738955      PMCID: PMC1284225          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

3.  Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; E M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  General outcome measures for verbal operants.

Authors:  Richard M Kubina; Pamela Wolfe; Douglas E Kostewicz
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2009

2.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

3.  Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen T North; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

5.  An Evaluation of Assistive Technology in Determining Job-Specific Preference for Adults With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities.

Authors:  Edith Walsh; Helena Lydon; Jennifer Holloway
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2019-08-05

6.  The effects of deprivation, presession exposure, and preferences on teaching manding to children with autism.

Authors:  Ellie C Hartman; Kevin P Klatt
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2005

7.  Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  K P Klatt; J A Sherman; J B Sheldon
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

8.  The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.

Authors:  David B McAdam; Kevin P Klatt; Mikhail Koffarnus; Anthony Dicesare; Katherine Solberg; Cassie Welch; Sean Murphy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

Review 9.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Reinforcing efficacy of food on performance during pre- and postmeal sessions.

Authors:  Liming Zhou; Brian A Iwata; Bridget A Shore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.