Literature DB >> 1890048

Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.

T R Vollmer1, B A Iwata.   

Abstract

Positive reinforcement procedures have had a major impact on educational programs for the developmentally disabled; nevertheless, variation in reinforcer effectiveness both within and across individuals is a common phenomenon. This study examined one class of variables--establishing operations--that might influence the effectiveness of reinforcers. Five developmentally disabled adult males participated. Responding on one of two motor tasks--switch closure or block placement--was assessed during baseline, satiation, and deprivation conditions with respect to three classes of consequences: small food items, music, and social praise. Deprivation and satiation conditions were constructed so as not to alter significantly the normal course of events in a subject's day. For example, food deprivation entailed scheduling sessions just prior to a subject's regular lunch, and social deprivation involved limiting a subject's access to social interaction for 15 minutes, during which time the subject had access to an assortment of other activities. Results showed that each stimulus class functioned as reinforcement with different degrees of effectiveness during satiation versus deprivation conditions. These results are discussed in light of previous research on enhancement of reinforcer efficacy as well as the assessment and identification of functional reinforcers, and implications are presented for future research and client habilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1890048      PMCID: PMC1279573          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  20 in total

1.  Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions.

Authors:  J L GEWIRTZ; D M BAER
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1958-09

2.  The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer.

Authors:  J L GEWIRTZ; D M BAER
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1958-01

3.  A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.

Authors:  S A Mason; G G McGee; V Farmer-Dougan; T R Risley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1989

4.  Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.

Authors:  J Dattilo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

5.  The relative motivational properties of sensory and edible reinforcers in teaching autistic children.

Authors:  A Rincover; C D Newsom
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

6.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

7.  Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.

Authors:  A L Egel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

9.  The effects of constant vs varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.

Authors:  A L Egel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1980-12

10.  The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children.

Authors:  M Ferrari; S L Harris
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981
View more
  38 in total

1.  Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.

Authors:  W K Berg; S Peck; D P Wacker; J Harding; J McComas; D Richman; K Brown
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Current research on the influence of establishing operations on behavior in applied settings.

Authors:  B A Iwata; R G Smith; J Michael
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

4.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Authors:  Eric S Murphy; Frances K McSweeney; Richard G Smith; Jennifer J McComas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Applying statistical process control to clinical data: an illustration.

Authors:  A Pfadt; I L Cohen; V Sudhalter; R G Romanczyk; D J Wheeler
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

7.  A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior.

Authors:  Mark O'Reilly; Russell Lang; Tonya Davis; Mandy Rispoli; Wendy Machalicek; Jeff Sigafoos; Giulio Lancioni; Robert Didden
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

8.  Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Eric W Boelter; David P Jarmolowicz
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2011

9.  Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen T North; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

10.  Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.

Authors:  Tiffany Kodak; Dorothea C Lerman; Valerie M Volkert; Nicole Trosclair
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.