Literature DB >> 11189826

Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

S A Fox1, J A Stein, R J Sockloskie, M G Ory.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Older women have the highest breast cancer rates but are underscreened relative to their risk. Racial/ethnic minority women especially have low screening rates, often because of financial constraints. In response, Medicare introduced subsidized biennial mammogram benefits in 1991. This study examined the effect on mammography rates of an intervention that informed women about the Medicare benefit.
METHODS: A list frame method of subject selection was used to select random samples of eligible women from the Health Care Financing Administration's master beneficiary file. Women were interviewed by telephone in 1991 (N = 917) before the targeted mailing and in 1993 (N = 922). One control and 2 treatment communities participated.
RESULTS: Mammogram use increased significantly among minorities in the treatment groups. Among minorities who received the intervention, Black women were twice as likely (odds ratio = 1.97) and Hispanic women were more than twice as likely (odds ratio = 2.33) to undergo screening relative to their untreated cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: A targeted low-cost mailed intervention can help increase screening rates among elderly minority women. The Health Care Financing Administration should promote its benefits aggressively if it expects to reach its target--elderly beneficiaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11189826      PMCID: PMC1446510          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  25 in total

Review 1.  Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion.

Authors:  V J Strecher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-02

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview.

Authors:  G D Dodd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

Authors:  B K Rimer; N Resch; E King; E Ross; C Lerman; A Boyce; H Kessler; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Breast cancer in aging women. A population-based study of contrasts in stage, surgery, and survival.

Authors:  R Yancik; L G Ries; J W Yates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

6.  Consumer knowledge of Medicare and supplemental health insurance benefits.

Authors:  N McCall; T Rice; J Sangl
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Medicare beneficiary decision making about health insurance. Implications for a voucher system.

Authors:  S A LaTour; B Friedman; E F Hughes
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  A two-step intervention of increase mammography among women aged 65 and older.

Authors:  N K Janz; D Schottenfeld; K M Doerr; S M Selig; R L Dunn; M Strawderman; P A Levine
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Mammography referrals for elderly women: is Medicare reimbursement likely to make a difference?

Authors:  M A Burg; D S Lane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age in 1987-88 and 1991. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  E A Coleman; E J Feuer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stability and change in health insurance among older Mexican Americans: longitudinal evidence from the Hispanic established populations for epidemiologic study of the elderly.

Authors:  Ronald J Angel; Jacqueline L Angel; Kyriakos S Markides
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women.

Authors:  Tatiana M Bailey; Jorge Delva; Kimberlee Gretebeck; Kristine Siefert; Amid Ismail
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

3.  Educating older African Americans about the preventive importance of routine comprehensive eye care.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; Beth T Stalvey; June Weston; Karen Searcey; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Mammography screening trends: the perspective of African American women born pre/post World War II.

Authors:  Karen Patricia Williams; Athur Mabiso; Yun-Jia Lo; Louis A Penner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Enhancing Health Message Framing With Metaphor and Cultural Values: Impact on Latinas' Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Melissa Spina; Jamie Arndt; Mark J Landau; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2018-02-05

6.  Randomized Electronic Promotion of Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot.

Authors:  Abbie L Begnaud; Anne M Joseph; Bruce R Lindgren
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-11

7.  The Efficacy of Direct Mail, Patient Navigation, and Incentives for Increasing Mammography and Colonoscopy in the Medicaid Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slater; Michael J Parks; Christina L Nelson; Kelly D Hughes
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Predictors of preventive service use among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ronald J Ozminkowski; Ron Z Goetzel; David Shechter; David C Stapleton; Onur Baser; Pauline Lapin
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2006
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.