Literature DB >> 20575209

Mammography screening trends: the perspective of African American women born pre/post World War II.

Karen Patricia Williams1, Athur Mabiso, Yun-Jia Lo, Louis A Penner.   

Abstract

Researchers have traditionally combined aging women (aged > or =50 years) when reporting their mammography use. This may inadvertently mask important cohort effects in mammography use, which are likely to result from distinct personal life experiences and generational differences. Using the Health and Retirement Study samples of 1998, 2000, and 2004, we examined cohort differences in mammography use between African American women born before 1946 (non-baby boomers) and those born in 1946 to 1953 (baby boomers). Between 1998 and 2004, screening rates for non-baby boomers declined, while those for baby boomers remained relatively steady. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses suggest that while screening rates decreased with age (OR, 0.957; 95% CI, 0.947-0.968) cohort effects may have partially reversed the age effect, with non-baby boomers having an increased likelihood of receiving a mammogram compared to baby boomers (OR, 1.697; 95% CI, 1.278-2.254). Because African American women are diagnosed at later stages of breast cancer, documentation of cohort differences in mammography use among older African American women is important as health care professionals design intervention programs that are maximally effective for women from different cohorts. This is particularly critical as more African American women in the baby boomer cohort become part of the aging population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20575209      PMCID: PMC3821170          DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30552-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  21 in total

1.  Is screening mammography effective in elderly women?

Authors:  R Smith-Bindman; K Kerlikowske; T Gebretsadik; J Newman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening for older women: recommendations and challenges for the 21st century.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; K R Yabroff
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2000

3.  Health insurance coverage and mortality among the near-elderly.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ellen Meara; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Leading the way in breast cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

Authors:  S A Fox; J A Stein; R J Sockloskie; M G Ory
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. For the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  D S Lane; J Zapka; N Breen; C R Messina; D J Fotheringham
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Judith A Long; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Screening mammography and Pap tests among older American women 1996-2000: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD).

Authors:  Truls Ostbye; Gary N Greenberg; Donald H Taylor; Ann Marie M Lee
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Limin X Clegg; Elizabeth Ward; Lynn A G Ries; Xiaocheng Wu; Patricia M Jamison; Phyllis A Wingo; Holly L Howe; Robert N Anderson; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.

Authors:  Robert M Saywell; Victoria L Champion; Terrell W Zollinger; Maltie Maraj; Celette Sugg Skinner; Kathleen A Zoppi; Carolyn M Muegge
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  1 in total

1.  Kin KeeperSM: design and baseline characteristics of a community-based randomized controlled trial promoting cancer screening in Black, Latina, and Arab women.

Authors:  Karen Patricia Williams; LeeAnne Roman; Cristian Ioan Meghea; Louis Penner; Adnan Hammad; Joseph Gardiner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.