Literature DB >> 1443958

Breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age in 1987-88 and 1991. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

E A Coleman1, E J Feuer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare breast cancer screening rates from the 1991 survey with data from 1987-88 for women aged 65 to 74.
DESIGN: Surveys of women from five communities. SETTINGS: Five control communities of the National Cancer Institute's Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. PARTICIPANTS: White, non-Hispanic women, ages 65 to 74; 499 in 1987-88 and 2156 in 1991. Response rates for the first survey wave ranged by area from 65% to 77% and for the second survey wave, from 62% to 85%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mammogram and clinical breast examination during the past year and performance of monthly breast self examination, with the screening rates in wave 2 directly standardized to the income and education distribution of wave 1 in each area.
RESULTS: Mammography use between waves increased significantly (P < 0.05 after adjusting for education, income, and age) in all but one area (from 19% to 33% in wave 1 to 35% to 59% in wave 2). Among women who had a mammogram, the percent who also had a clinical breast examination decreased between waves from 95% to 85% (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Mammography in older women increased dramatically over 3 years, although the use of clinical breast examination may be decreasing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1443958     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-11-961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  10 in total

1.  The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  N Breen; E J Feuer; S Depuy; J Zapka
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A comparison of the preventive health care provided by women's health centers and general internal medicine practices.

Authors:  L H Harpole; E A Mort; K M Freund; J Orav; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue.

Authors:  M M McDermott; N C Dolan; J Huang; D Reifler; A W Rademaker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Redesigning primary care processes to improve the offering of mammography. The use of clinic protocols by nonphysicians.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M U Yood; M B Bolton; E A Boohaker; C H MacWilliam; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

Authors:  S A Fox; J A Stein; R J Sockloskie; M G Ory
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A two-step intervention of increase mammography among women aged 65 and older.

Authors:  N K Janz; D Schottenfeld; K M Doerr; S M Selig; R L Dunn; M Strawderman; P A Levine
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes and behavior among schoolteachers in Italy.

Authors:  M Pavia; G Ricciardi; A Bianco; P Pantisano; E Langiano; I F Angelillo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Primary care physicians' perceptions of the effect of insurance status on clinical decision making.

Authors:  David S Meyers; Ranit Mishori; Jessica McCann; Jose Delgado; Ann S O'Malley; Ed Fryer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; L Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple clinicians: a qualitative metasummary.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Danièle Roberge; George K Freeman; Christine Beaulieu
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.