Literature DB >> 1641432

Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

B K Rimer1, N Resch, E King, E Ross, C Lerman, A Boyce, H Kessler, P F Engstrom.   

Abstract

Mammography use decreases with age although the risk of breast cancer increases with age. Medicare now provides biennial coverage for screening mammography. This study was designed to simulate the Medicare condition by subsidizing mammography among women in eight retirement communities in the metropolitan Philadelphia area. The study also measured the impact of health education interventions and the presence of a mobile mammography van on increased use of mammography. Retirement communities were assigned randomly to the control (cost subsidy alone) or experimental group (cost subsidy, mammography van, and tailored health education interventions). A total of 412 women ages 65 and older who had not had mammograms in the previous year were surveyed at baseline and 3 months later. Analytic techniques reflected the cluster nature of the randomization. Women in the experimental group were significantly more likely than the control group women to have obtained mammograms. Forty-five percent of the experimental group women compared with 12 percent of the control group women subsequently had mammograms in the 3 months after the baseline interview (P less than .001). Logistic regression analysis for mammography use indicated an odds ratio of 6.1 associated with being in the experimental group. For women in the experimental group, a separate logistic regression for mammography use showed an odds ratio of 7.8 associated with attendance at the educational presentation. The results suggest that Medicare coverage alone will not increase mammography use sufficiently to achieve year 2000 objectives. However, the addition of access enhancing and health education interventions boosts utilization dramatically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641432      PMCID: PMC1403666     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  14 in total

1.  Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: a Los Angeles County survey.

Authors:  R Bastani; A C Marcus; A Hollatz-Brown
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Corporate-sponsored breast cancer screening at the work site: results of a statewide program.

Authors:  H B Kessler; B K Rimer; P J Devine; R A Gatenby; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Age group differences in the use of breast cancer screening tests. The effects of health care utilization and socioeconomic variables.

Authors:  M A Burg; D S Lane; A P Polednak
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  1990-11

7.  Breast cancer screening in older women: practices and barriers reported by primary care physicians.

Authors:  M Weinberger; A F Saunders; G P Samsa; L B Bearon; D T Gold; J T Brown; P Booher; P J Loehrer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; C Jepson; D Brody; A Boyce
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Breast cancer and aging.

Authors:  J A Stewart; R S Foster
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.929

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a worksite intervention to reduce an occupational exposure: the Minnesota wood dust study.

Authors:  DeAnn Lazovich; David L Parker; Lisa M Brosseau; F Thomas Milton; Siobhan K Dugan; Wei Pan; Lynette Hock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women.

Authors:  Tatiana M Bailey; Jorge Delva; Kimberlee Gretebeck; Kristine Siefert; Amid Ismail
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

3.  Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.

Authors:  Electra Paskett; Cathy Tatum; Julia Rushing; Robert Michielutte; Ronny Bell; Kristie Long Foley; Marisa Bittoni; Stephanie L Dickinson; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Mammography using in a community-based sample of older women.

Authors:  J T Fullerton; D Kritz-Silverstein; G Robins Sadler; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-03

5.  Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption.

Authors:  W Rakowski; B Ehrich; C E Dubé; D N Pearlman; M G Goldstein; K K Peterson; B K Rimer; H Woolverton
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-06

6.  Acceptance of a community-based navigator program for cancer control among urban African Americans.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Vanessa Briggs; Marjorie Bowman; Brenda Bryant; Debbie Chatman Bryant; Ernestine Delmoor; Monica Ferguson; Marvella E Ford; Jerry C Johnson; Joseph Purnell; Rodney Rogers; Benita Weathers
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-10-29

7.  Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

Authors:  S A Fox; J A Stein; R J Sockloskie; M G Ory
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A Community-Based Outreach Navigator Approach to Establishing Partnerships for a Safety Net Mammography Screening Center.

Authors:  Sherrie Wallington; Bridget Oppong; Chiranjeev Dash; Tesha Coleman; Holly Greenwald; Tanya Torres; Marquita Iddirisu; Lucile Lauren Adams-Campbell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Effect of mammography outreach in women veterans.

Authors:  K M Dalessandri; M Cooper; T Rucker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-09

10.  Mammography stages of change in middle-aged women with schizophrenia: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Laurie A Lindamer; Emily Wear; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.