Literature DB >> 16295701

A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women.

Tatiana M Bailey1, Jorge Delva, Kimberlee Gretebeck, Kristine Siefert, Amid Ismail.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of educational interventions in increasing mammography screening among low-income women. DATA SOURCES: Bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the ISI Web of Science, were searched for relevant articles. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized, community-based trials targeting low-income women and published between January 1980 and March 2003 were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The search yielded 242 studies; 24 met all inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three studies used mammography vans, three used low-cost vouchers or provided free mammograms, three used home visits, one used community education alone, one provided referrals, five incorporated multiple intervention strategies, two used phone calls, one used videos and print material, and five used primarily print material.
RESULTS: Of nine studies that reduced barriers to care via mammography vans, cost vouchers, or home visits, eight showed statistically significant increases in mammography screening. Seven of the eight studies that used peer educators had significant increases in screening, as did four of the five studies that used multiple (intervention) components.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that used peer educators, incorporated multiple intervention strategies, or provided easy access via vans, cost vouchers, or home visits were effective in increasing screenings. Mailed letter or telephone reminders were not effective in trials involving low-income women, which is contrary to findings from middle/upper-income studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16295701      PMCID: PMC1820866          DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  33 in total

1.  The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening.

Authors:  Julie Legler; Helen I Meissner; Cathy Coyne; Nancy Breen; Veronica Chollette; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A randomized controlled trial comparing three invitation strategies in a breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  J M Segura; X Castells; M Casamitjana; F Macià; M Porta; S J Katz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  S V Subramanian; Daniel J Kim; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  A randomized community trial to increase mammography utilization among low-income women living in public housing.

Authors:  J S Slater; C N Ha; M E Malone; P McGovern; S D Madigan; J R Finnegan; A L Casey-Paal; K L Margolis; N Lurie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women.

Authors:  David B Reuben; Lawrence W Bassett; Susan H Hirsch; Catherine A Jackson; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  An intervention study on screening for breast cancer among single African-American women aged 65 and older.

Authors:  Kangmin Zhu; Sandra Hunter; Louis J Bernard; Kathleen Payne-Wilks; Chanel L Roland; Lloyd C Elam; Ziding Feng; Robert S Levine
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women.

Authors:  Victoria Champion; Maltie Maraj; Siu Hui; Anthony J Perkins; William Tierney; Usha Menon; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  A controlled evaluation of staging dietary patterns to reduce the risk of diabetes in African-American women.

Authors:  Wendy Auslander; Debra Haire-Joshu; Cheryl Houston; Chaie-Won Rhee; James Herbert Williams
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Peer led HIV/AIDS prevention for women in South African informal settlements.

Authors:  Peggy O'Hara Murdock; Hari Garbharran; Mary Jo Edwards; Maria A Smith; Johnny Lutchmiah; Makhosi Mkhize
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2003-07

10.  Tailored messages, external barriers, and women's utilization of professional breast cancer screening over time.

Authors:  Diane Ruth Lauver; Lori Settersten; Janet H Kane; Jeffrey B Henriques
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  12 in total

1.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Promoting mammography adherence in underserved women: the telephone coaching adherence study.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Judy Huei-yu Wang; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Shiela Harmon Martin; Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; George Luta
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Community-based participatory approach to reduce breast cancer disparities in south Dallas.

Authors:  Kathryn Cardarelli; Rachael Jackson; Marcus Martin; Kim Linnear; Roy Lopez; Charles Senteio; Preston Weaver; Anna Hill; Jesse Banda; Marva Epperson-Brown; Janet Morrison; Deborah Parrish; J R Newton; Marcene Royster; Sheila Haley; Camille Lafayette; Phyllis Harris; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Eric S Johnson
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2011

4.  Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Barbara K Rimer; Jeanine M Matuszewski; David Farrell; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Geographic access and the use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Nicole M Ishill; Jacqueline G Snow; Katherine S Panageas; Peter B Bach; Laura Liberman; Fahui Wang; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Breast cancer screening interventions in selected counties across US regions.

Authors:  Shamly Austin; Michelle Y Martin; Robert S Levine; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Caroline Cranos
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10

8.  Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Kara Keels; Stephanie Schoap; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Developing a culturally responsive breast cancer screening promotion with Native Hawaiian women in churches.

Authors:  Lana Sue Ka'opua
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2008-08

Review 10.  Interventions to increase the uptake of mammography amongst low income women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Gardner; Abbey Adams; Mona Jeffreys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.