Literature DB >> 30657381

Randomized Electronic Promotion of Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot.

Abbie L Begnaud1, Anne M Joseph1, Bruce R Lindgren1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography is endorsed by the US Preventive Services Task Force, but many eligible patients have yet to be offered screening. Major barriers to the implementation of screening are physician and system related-the requirement for a detailed smoking history, including pack-years, to determine eligibility. We conducted this pilot to determine the feasibility of lung cancer screening (LCS) promotion that would offer screening to eligible persons and patient completion of smoking history to estimate the size of the population of former smokers who may be eligible for LCS in a single health care system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred participants were randomly selected from former smokers who were seen at the University of Minnesota Health in the past 2 years and assigned to control (usual care) and electronic promotion, stratified by age. Electronic messages to promote LCS were sent to an intervention group, including a link to complete a detailed smoking history in the electronic health record.
RESULTS: Of 99 participants, 66 (67%) in the intervention group read the message, 24 (36%) of 66 responded, and 19 (79%) of 24 respondents completed the smoking history. Ten intervention participants and 13 usual care participants were eligible for screening on the basis of pack-year history. Four eligible participants underwent screening in the intervention group compared with one participant in the usual care group.
CONCLUSION: Electronic promotion may help identify patients who are eligible for LCS but will not reliably reach all patients because of low response rates. In this sample of former smokers, the majority are ineligible for LCS on the basis of pack-year history. Electronic methods can improve documentation of smoking history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30657381      PMCID: PMC6874003          DOI: 10.1200/CCI.17.00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform        ISSN: 2473-4276


  13 in total

1.  A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Timothy R Church; Mark W Yeazel; Resa M Jones; Laura K Kochevar; Gavin D Watt; Steven J Mongin; Jill E Cordes; Deborah Engelhard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation.

Authors:  Hannah E Modin; Joelle T Fathi; Christopher R Gilbert; Candice L Wilshire; Andrew K Wilson; Ralph W Aye; Alexander S Farivar; Brian E Louie; Eric Vallières; Jed A Gorden
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-08

3.  Meaningful use and the patient portal: patient enrollment, use, and satisfaction with patient portals at a later-adopting center.

Authors:  Joan Neuner; Megan Fedders; Mary Caravella; Lisa Bradford; Marilyn Schapira
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  The accuracy and trends of smoking history documentation in electronic medical records in a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Lie-Hong Chen; Virginia Quinn; Lanfang Xu; Michael K Gould; Steven J Jacobsen; Corinna Koebnick; Kristi Reynolds; Rulin C Hechter; Chun R Chao
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: increasing mammogram screening among the elderly.

Authors:  S A Fox; J A Stein; R J Sockloskie; M G Ory
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Erin K McMurtry; Dorinda J Leutink; Rosa L Cabanela; James M Naessens; Ahmed S Rahman; Lynn A Davis; Robert J Stroebel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

7.  Ordering of the Serum Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Test in Patients Receiving Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy: An Avoidable but Common Error.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Johanna Savage; Alexandra Ehlers; Jon Maakestad; Gregory A Schmidt; Sonia La'ulu; Natalie N Rasmussen; Frederick G Strathmann; Jonathan R Genzen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole Je Horevoorts; Pauline Aj Vissers; Floortje Mols; Melissa Sy Thong; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Health Care Consumers: An Acceptance Model and Survey.

Authors:  Jorge Tavares; Tiago Oliveira
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Using a Patient Portal to Transmit Patient Reported Health Information into the Electronic Record: Workflow Implications and User Experience.

Authors:  Barbara Sorondo; Amy Allen; Janet Bayleran; Stacy Doore; Samreen Fathima; Iyad Sabbagh; Lori Newcomb
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-08-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.

Authors:  Polina V Kukhareva; Tanner J Caverly; Haojia Li; Hormuzd A Katki; Li C Cheung; Thomas J Reese; Guilherme Del Fiol; Rachel Hess; David W Wetter; Yue Zhang; Teresa Y Taft; Michael C Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.