Literature DB >> 11175911

Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between the hip and spine measurement sites.

G Woodson1.   

Abstract

T-score discordance is observed when the difference between the hip and spine are sufficient to result in the two measurement sites falling into two different diagnoses as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. This article examines the prevalence of patterns of T-score discordance between the total hip and PA L1-L4 total spine sites in 5051 female patients undergoing dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone density testing at a community-based outpatient osteoporosis testing center between 1989 and 1999. Data for all patients was stored in a relational database that was searched for various combinations of T-scores reflecting the nine possible discordant and concordant permutations of normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis. The WHO diagnostic classification system for osteoporosis categorizes patients into three diagnoses-normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis-and is based upon their T-score. This system was used to determine the patient diagnoses for the various T-score results in the PA L1-L4 lumbar spine and total hip. Concordance was defined as present when the spine and hip T-score placed the patient in the same diagnostic class. Minor discordance was defined as present when the difference between two sites is no more than one WHO diagnostic class. Major discordance was defined as present when one site is osteoporotic and the other site is normal. The results showed that in 56% of the cases the T-score concordance was present between the hip and the spine, 39% of the time minor discordance was observed, and 5% of the time major discordance was found. Discordance was also classified into five etiological types: physiologic, pathophysiologic, anatomic, artifactual, and technical. In summary, this data analysis showed that while T-score concordance is most commonly observed, minor discordance is seen in about two out of every five patients tested with DXA between the spine and hip sites. Major discordance was uncommon, being found in only 1 out of every 20 patients tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11175911     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:3:4:319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  34 in total

1.  Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; C Cepollaro; A Del Puente; S Giannini; S Gonnelli; D Maggio; C Marcocci; S Minisola; E Palummeri; M Rossini; L Sartori; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prevalence and risk factors of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry.

Authors:  Abdellah El Maghraoui; Davy A Mouinga Abayi; Imad Ghozlani; Aziza Mounach; Abderrazak Nouijai; Mirieme Ghazi; Lahsen Achemlal; Ahmed Bezza
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Number of osteoporotic sites as a modifying factor for bone mineral density.

Authors:  Jong Seok Lee; Sungwha Lee; Ohk-Hyun Ryu; Moon-Gi Choi; Youn Ji Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Lumbar spine bone mineral density in US adults: demographic patterns and relationship with femur neck skeletal status.

Authors:  A C Looker; L J Melton; L G Borrud; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Evaluation of the bone mineral density in the Mexican female population using the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) technology.

Authors:  Rosales-Ortiz Sergio; Rivera García Elaín Nayelli
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  High prevalence of low bone density in young Iranian healthy individuals.

Authors:  Iraj Salehi; Shabnam Khazaeli; Seyed Reza Najafizadeh; Haleh Ashraf; Mahdi Malekpour
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Howard A Fink; Stephanie L Harrison; Brent C Taylor; Steven R Cummings; John T Schousboe; Michael A Kuskowski; Katie L Stone; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Z-score discordance and contributing factors in healthy premenopausal women with low bone mineral density: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-9.

Authors:  Kyeong Hye Park; Jung Soo Lim; Kyoung Min Kim; Yumie Rhee; Sung-Kil Lim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  WHOLE BODY AND REGIONAL BONE MINERAL CONTENT AND DENSITY IN WOMEN AGED 20-75 YEARS.

Authors:  M A Boyanov
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

10.  Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?

Authors:  K M Knapp; G M Blake; T D Spector; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.