Literature DB >> 25522785

Number of osteoporotic sites as a modifying factor for bone mineral density.

Jong Seok Lee1, Sungwha Lee2, Ohk-Hyun Ryu3, Moon-Gi Choi3, Youn Ji Kim4.   

Abstract

Discordance has been proposed as a new predictor of fracture risk that may affect fracture risk via bone mineral density (BMD). With an emphasis on better understanding the relationship between discordance and BMD, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of the number of osteoporotic sites, as an indicator of discordance, on BMD and to explore the clinical significance of BMD modification by this factor. This study was based on data obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2011, which is a nationwide cross-sectional study. Among postmenopausal women aged 50 years or older, 3,849 women whose BMD was measured at three sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip) were included in the study. The diagnosis was consistent across sites in only 39.2-59.0 % of cases. Lumbar spine T-score was reduced by 0.163 for two osteoporotic sites and by 0.462 for three osteoporotic sites, compared with having one osteoporotic site at the lumbar spine only. Femoral neck T-score was reduced by 0.609 for three osteoporotic sites compared with one or two osteoporotic sites. Using BMD adjusted for discordance, we found fracture risk probability changed significantly. Our results confirmed that BMD discordance was considerably high among Korean women in their 50s and older owing to site-dependent differences in the pattern of BMD reduction with age. Mean BMD decreased with increasing number of osteoporotic sites. Using a modified BMD adjusted for the number of osteoporotic sites may offer more accurate fracture risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Discordance; Fracture risk assessment; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25522785     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0635-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  15 in total

1.  A comparative study of using non-hip bone density inputs with FRAX®.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Catherine M Gordon; Sanford Baim; Mary B Leonard; Nicholas J Bishop; Maria-Luisa Bianchi; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Craig B Langman; Horatio Plotkin; Frank Rauch; Babette S Zemel; Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Didier B Hans; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX(®): a population-based report from CAMOS.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Christopher S Kovacs; Wojciech P Olszynski; Tanveer Towheed; Stephanie M Kaiser; Jerilynn C Prior; Robert G Josse; Sophie A Jamal; Nancy Kreiger; David Goltzman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Predicting clinical discordance of bone mineral density.

Authors:  G Larcos
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; H Kroger; R Honkanen; L J Melton; T O'Neill; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A prospective study of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and proximal femur bone densitometry.

Authors:  D O'Gradaigh; I Debiram; S Love; H K Richards; J E Compston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Masao Fukunaga; Toshitsugu Sugimoto; Teruki Sone; Saeko Fujiwara; Naoto Endo; Itsuo Gorai; Masataka Shiraki; Hiroshi Hagino; Takayuki Hosoi; Hiroaki Ohta; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Tatsushi Tomomitsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.