Literature DB >> 18296090

Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures.

Howard A Fink1, Stephanie L Harrison, Brent C Taylor, Steven R Cummings, John T Schousboe, Michael A Kuskowski, Katie L Stone, Kristine E Ensrud.   

Abstract

To examine the fracture pattern in older women whose bone mineral density (BMD) T-score criteria for osteoporosis at hip and spine disagree, hip and spine BMD were measured in Study of Osteoporotic Fractures participants using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Hip osteoporosis was defined as T-score <or=-2.5 at femoral neck or total hip, and spine osteoporosis as T-score <or=-2.5 at lumbar spine. Incident clinical fractures were self-reported and centrally adjudicated. Incident radiographic spine fractures were defined morphometrically. Compared to women with osteoporosis at neither hip nor spine, those osteoporotic only at hip had a 3.0-fold age- and weight-adjusted increased risk for hip fracture (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-3.6), and smaller increases in risk of nonhip nonspine (hazard ratios [HR]=1.6), clinical spine (odds ratio [OR]=2.2), and radiographic spine fractures (OR=1.5). Women osteoporotic only at spine had a 2.8-fold increased odds of radiographic spine fracture (95% CI: 2.1-3.8), and smaller increases in risk of clinical spine (OR=1.4), nonhip nonspine (HR=1.6), and hip fractures (HR=1.2). Discordant BMD results predict different fracture patterns. DXA fracture risk estimation in these patients should be site specific. Women osteoporotic only at spine would not have been identified from hip BMD measurement alone, and may have a sufficiently high fracture risk to warrant preventive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18296090      PMCID: PMC2724071          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  23 in total

1.  Classification of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R Eastell; S L Cedel; H W Wahner; B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The accuracy of self-report of fractures in elderly women: evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; S R Cummings; W S Browner; D G Seeley; J A Cauley; T M Vogt; D M Black
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Exclusion of focal vertebral artifacts from spine bone densitometry and fracture prediction: a comparison of expert physicians, three computer algorithms, and the minimum vertebra.

Authors:  James F Tsang; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; David Bates; Dennis M Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities.

Authors:  Y Lu; H K Genant; J Shepherd; S Zhao; A Mathur; T P Fuerst; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; K Stone; E Hudes; L Palermo; P Steiger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between the hip and spine measurement sites.

Authors:  G Woodson
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women is dependent on site-specific analysis.

Authors:  L F Varney; R A Parker; A Vincelette; S L Greenspan
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  15 in total

1.  What analytic method should clinicians use to derive spine T-scores and predict incident fractures in men? Results from the MrOS study.

Authors:  K E Hansen; R D Blank; L Palermo; H A Fink; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Spine-hip T-score difference predicts major osteoporotic fracture risk independent of FRAX(®): a population-based report from CAMOS.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Christopher S Kovacs; Wojciech P Olszynski; Tanveer Towheed; Stephanie M Kaiser; Jerilynn C Prior; Robert G Josse; Sophie A Jamal; Nancy Kreiger; David Goltzman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Lumbar spine bone mineral density in US adults: demographic patterns and relationship with femur neck skeletal status.

Authors:  A C Looker; L J Melton; L G Borrud; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and fracture prediction in patients with spinal cord injuries and disorders.

Authors:  L Abderhalden; F M Weaver; M Bethel; H Demirtas; S Burns; J Svircev; H Hoenig; K Lyles; S Miskevics; L D Carbone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Determination of an applicable FRAX model in Korean women.

Authors:  Dong-Yun Lee; Seung-Jae Lim; Young-Wan Moon; Yong-Ki Min; DooSeok Choi; Byung-Koo Yoon; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Bone-muscle indices as risk factors for fractures in men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  A K O Wong; P M Cawthon; K W Peters; S R Cummings; C L Gordon; Y Sheu; K Ensrud; M Petit; J M Zmuda; E Orwoll; J Cauley
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Prevention and management of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in persons with a spinal cord injury or disorder: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Nour Zleik; Frances Weaver; Robert L Harmon; Brian Le; Reshmitha Radhakrishnan; Wanda D Jirau-Rosaly; B Catharine Craven; Mattie Raiford; Jennifer N Hill; Bella Etingen; Marylou Guihan; Michael H Heggeness; Cara Ray; Laura Carbone
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Comparison of the Spine and Hip BMD Assessments Derived from Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Ma; Wei Zhang; Yan Wang; Peng Xue; Yu-Kun Li
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Risk factors for spinal osteoporosis as compared with femoral osteoporosis in urban Iranian women.

Authors:  A Keramat; B Larigani; H Adibi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 10.  Genome-wide Association Studies for Osteoporosis: A 2013 Update.

Authors:  Yong-Jun Liu; Lei Zhang; Christopher J Papasian; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.