Literature DB >> 14530829

Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

M Pedrazzoni1, G Girasole, F Bertoldo, G Bianchi, C Cepollaro, A Del Puente, S Giannini, S Gonnelli, D Maggio, C Marcocci, S Minisola, E Palummeri, M Rossini, L Sartori, L Sinigaglia.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is currently defined on the basis of the T-score by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Despite its limitations, this definition is applied worldwide. However, the normal values provided by manufacturers may not be fully representative of specific local populations. So far, there are no normative data in the Italian population using Hologic densitometers. The Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS) is an ongoing multi-center study that aims to establish reference values for bone densitometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the male and female Italian population. In this paper we report the results of the lumbar vertebrae (L2-L4) and proximal femur in 1,622 women aged 20-79 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on Hologic bone densitometers (Hologic, Waltham, Mass.). Most of the subjects were examined with a QDR 4500. The BMD of the lumbar vertebrae was virtually constant between 20 and 49 years (test for trend: P=0.66); the BMD values between 20-45 in premenopausal women (mean 1.036; SD 0.109 g/cm(2)) were thus defined as the peak bone mass values, significantly lower compared to the Hologic reference curve (mean 1.079, SD 0.11 g/cm(2)). The mean BMD values of the femoral neck were virtually identical to those of the NHANES study in the first 3 decades; after the age of 50 the BMD values were slightly greater than those of the NHANES subject. The subject classification according to the WHO criteria was similar using the DINS and NHANES reference values for the femur; for the spine, the Hologic reference values classified a larger proportion of women as osteoporotic (21 vs. 16%) or osteopenic (42 vs. 38%) compared to DINS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530829     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1521-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density in Australia compared with the United States.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; R B Mazess; P N Sambrook; M G Yeates; J Freund
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral density.

Authors:  E A Krall; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Peak bone mass.

Authors:  J P Bonjour; G Theintz; F Law; D Slosman; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; B Jonsson; C De Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults.

Authors:  A C Looker; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M S Calvo; T B Harris; S P Heyse; C C Johnston; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone mineral density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: reference population, definition of peak bone mass, and measured site determine prevalence.

Authors:  O Löfman; L Larsson; G Toss
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  26 in total

1.  Integrated model for denosumab and ibandronate pharmacodynamics in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Dhananjay D Marathe; Anshu Marathe; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.627

2.  Bone status of Indian women from a low-income group and its relationship to the nutritional status.

Authors:  Veena Shatrugna; Bharati Kulkarni; P Ajay Kumar; K Usha Rani; N Balakrishna
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effects of the sample size of reference population on determining BMD reference curve and peak BMD and diagnosing osteoporosis.

Authors:  Y-L Hou; E-Y Liao; X-P Wu; Y-Q Peng; H Zhang; R-C Dai; X-H Luo; X-Z Cao
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Assessment of the 10-year risk of fracture in Italian postmenopausal women using FRAX®: a north Italian multicenter study.

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; A Giusti; A Barone; G Pioli; G Passeri; E Palummeri; G Bianchi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Prevalence of less severe hypercortisolism in fractured patients admitted in an outpatient clinic for metabolic bone diseases.

Authors:  F Pugliese; A S Salcuni; C Battista; V Carnevale; G Guglielmi; C Columbu; F Velluzzi; L Giovanelli; C Eller-Vainicher; A Scillitani; I Chiodini
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Prevalence of kidney stones and vertebral fractures in primary hyperparathyroidism using imaging technology.

Authors:  Cristiana Cipriani; Federica Biamonte; Aline G Costa; Chiyuan Zhang; Piergianni Biondi; Daniele Diacinti; Jessica Pepe; Sara Piemonte; Alfredo Scillitani; Salvatore Minisola; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis in Italian postmenopausal women according to the National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  C Cipriani; J Pepe; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; F P Cantatore; A Corrado; M Di Stefano; B Frediani; D Gatti; A Giustina; T Porcelli; G Isaia; M Rossini; L Nieddu; S Minisola; G Girasole; M Pedrazzoni
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Relationship between body composition, body mass index and bone mineral density in a large population of normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  A Andreoli; A Bazzocchi; M Celi; D Lauro; R Sorge; U Tarantino; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Effect of gender and geographic location on the expression of primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  F De Lucia; S Minisola; E Romagnoli; J Pepe; C Cipriani; A Scillitani; N Parikh; D S Rao
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Association between iron overload and osteoporosis in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis.

Authors:  L Valenti; M Varenna; A L Fracanzani; V Rossi; S Fargion; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.