Literature DB >> 14685652

Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?

K M Knapp1, G M Blake, T D Spector, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent but preventable disease and, as such, it is important that there are appropriate diagnostic criteria to identify those at risk of low trauma fracture. In 1994 the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced definitions of osteoporosis and osteopenia using T-scores, which identified 30% of all Caucasian post-menopausal women as having osteoporosis. However, the use of the WHO T-score thresholds of -2.5 for osteoporosis and -1.0 for osteopenia may be inappropriate at skeletal sites other than the spine, hip and forearm or when other modalities, such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) are used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the age-dependence of T-scores for speed of sound (SOS) measurements at the radius, tibia, phalanx and metatarsal by use of the Sunlight Omnisense, to evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia at these sites by use of the WHO criteria, and calculate appropriate equivalent T-score thresholds. The study population consisted of 278 healthy pre-menopausal women, 194 healthy post-menopausal women and 115 women with atraumatic vertebral fractures. All women had SOS measurements at the radius, tibia, phalanx and metatarsal and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and hip. A group of healthy pre-menopausal women aged 20-40 years from the pre-menopausal group were used to estimate the population mean and SD for each of the SOS and BMD measurement sites. Healthy post-menopausal women were classified into normal, osteopenic or osteoporotic, based upon the standard WHO definition of osteoporosis and expressed as a percentage. We investigated the age-related decline in T-scores from 20-79 by stratifying the healthy subjects into 10-year age groups and calculating the mean T-score for each of these groups. Finally, we estimated appropriate T-score thresholds, using five different approaches. The prevalence of osteoporosis in the post-menopausal women aged 50 years and over ranged from 1.4 to 12.7% for SOS and 1.3 to 5.2% for BMD. The age-related decline in T-scores ranged from -0.92 to -1.80 for SOS measurements in the 60 to 69-year age group and -0.60 to -1.19 for BMD measurements in the same age group. The WHO definition was not suitable for use with SOS measurements, and revised T-score thresholds for the diagnosis of osteoporosis of -2.6, -3.0, -3.0 and -2.2 and for osteopenia of -1.4, -1.6, -2.3, and -1.4, for the radius, tibia, phalanx and metatarsal, respectively, were recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14685652     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1555-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Occupational activity and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women in England.

Authors:  C A Coupland; M J Grainge; S J Cliffe; D J Hosking; C E Chilvers
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  E Dennison; R Eastell; C H Fall; S Kellingray; P J Wood; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  High intensity resistance training: effects on bone in older men and women.

Authors:  G F Maddalozzo; C M Snow
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  H E Meyer; A Tverdal; J A Falch; J I Pedersen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Standardization of measurements for assessing BMD by DXA.

Authors:  P Steiger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model?

Authors:  P A Ballard; D W Purdie; C M Langton; S A Steel; S Mussurakis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults.

Authors:  A C Looker; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M S Calvo; T B Harris; S P Heyse; C C Johnston; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women.

Authors:  T Andrew; D J Hart; H Snieder; M de Lange; T D Spector; A J MacGregor
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2001-12

Review 10.  Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use?

Authors:  G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  10 in total

1.  Low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity correlates with bone mineral density and cortical thickness in the radius and tibia in pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Kilappa; P Moilanen; L Xu; P H F Nicholson; J Timonen; S Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: the Hizen-Oshima study.

Authors:  Y Abe; N Takamura; Z Ye; M Tomita; M Osaki; Y Kusano; T Nakamura; K Aoyagi; S Honda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Axial Transmission: Techniques, Devices and Clinical Results.

Authors:  Nicolas Bochud; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Osteosarcopenic obesity and its components-osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and obesity-are associated with blood cell count-derived inflammation indices in older Chinese people.

Authors:  Yi-Zhen Nie; Zhao-Qi Yan; Hui Yin; Ling-Han Shan; Jia-Hui Wang; Qun-Hong Wu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.070

6.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in a Korean population: reference data and relationship to bone mineral density determined by peripheral dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Min-Ho Shin; Sun-Seog Kweon; Kyeong-Soo Park; Heon Heo; Seung-joon Kim; Hae-Sung Nam; Seul-Ki Jeong; Eun-Kyung Chung; Jin-Su Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow-up: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; George Ioannidis; Kenneth S Davison
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Association of the I264T variant in the sulfide quinone reductase-like (SQRDL) gene with osteoporosis in Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hyun-Seok Jin; Jeonghyun Kim; Sangwook Park; Eunkuk Park; Bo-Young Kim; Vit-Na Choi; Young-Hyun Yoo; Bom-Taeck Kim; Seon-Yong Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Weak cation exchange magnetic beads coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry in screening serum protein markers in osteopenia.

Authors:  Wei-Tao He; Bo-Cheng Liang; Zhen-Yu Shi; Xu-Yun Li; Chun-Wen Li; Xiao-Lin Shi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-21

10.  Prospective comparative study of quantitative X-ray (QXR) versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to determine the performance of QXR as a predictor of bone health for adult patients in secondary care.

Authors:  Amar Rangan; Stephen P Tuck; Paul D Scott; Lucksy Kottam; Maya Jafari; Terence Watson; Ben Lopez; Ben Crone; Tim Whitbread; Adam Ratcliffe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.