Literature DB >> 35257242

Evaluation of the bone mineral density in the Mexican female population using the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) technology.

Rosales-Ortiz Sergio1, Rivera García Elaín Nayelli2.   

Abstract

The bone health status of a Mexican female population, including a cohort of 455 women aged over 40 years, was assessed by Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS).
PURPOSE: Assessment of the bone health status in an average female Mexican population with REMS. The secondary objective investigated age- and body mass index (BMI)-related effects on the diagnostic classification and the influence of risk factors for osteoporosis.
METHODS: Women aged over 40 years underwent a REMS scan at the lumbar spine and both femoral necks. The degree of correlation of the bone mineral density (BMD) across axial sites was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), along with the diagnostic discordance. The association between risk factors, age, and BMI and diagnostic classification was determined by the chi-squared test.
RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-one women were enrolled. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 11.0%, 8.1%, and 8.3% of cases at the lumbar spine and right and left femoral neck, respectively. The diagnostic agreement between the lumbar spine and femoral necks was about 73% (85% considering a 0.3 T-score tolerance), whereas the agreement between the femoral necks was 97.4% (99.6% considering a 0.3 T-score tolerance). Most of discordant cases were minor discordances. The correlation between the lumbar spine and femoral neck was r = 0.82 and 0.85, respectively, whereas both femoral necks correlated with r = 0.97. As expected, the prevalence of osteoporosis increased with age and decreased as BMI increased.
CONCLUSION: The widespread applicability of the non-ionizing REMS technology has been demonstrated in a representative Mexican cohort, covering wide age and BMI ranges. Age and BMI variations correlate with the prevalence of osteoporosis, in line with the recent scientific literature.
© 2022. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Bone health; Osteoporosis diagnosis; Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35257242     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01080-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  26 in total

1.  Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  P Tothill; W J Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling.

Authors:  H H Bolotin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Could Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) Overcome the Limitations of BMD by DXA Related to Artifacts? A Series of 3 Cases.

Authors:  Maria Dea Tomai Pitinca; Pietro Fortini; Stefano Gonnelli; Carla Caffarelli
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Abdellah El Maghraoui; Lahsen Achemlal; Ahmed Bezza
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 5.  Update on Imaging-Based Measurement of Bone Mineral Density and Quality.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Galateia Kazakia
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Michele Bandirali; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Nathascja Katia D'Alonzo; Giovanni Di Leo; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The prevalence of radiographic vertebral fractures in Latin American countries: the Latin American Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (LAVOS).

Authors:  P Clark; F Cons-Molina; M Deleze; S Ragi; L Haddock; J R Zanchetta; J J Jaller; L Palermo; J O Talavera; D O Messina; J Morales-Torres; J Salmeron; A Navarrete; E Suarez; C M Pérez; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicholas R Fuggle; Elizabeth M Curtis; Kate A Ward; Nicholas C Harvey; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry for the in-vivo assessment of bone strength: state of the art-outcomes of an expert consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Authors:  Nasser Al-Daghri; Jaime C Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Loredana Cavalli; Cyrus Cooper; Bernard Cortet; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Hans Peter Dimai; Stefano Gonnelli; Peyman Hadji; Philippe Halbout; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andreas Kurth; Medea Locquet; Stefania Maggi; Radmila Matijevic; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Thomas Thierry; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.