Literature DB >> 12845470

Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T.

W Schwindt1, H Kugel, R Bachmann, S Kloska, T Allkemper, D Maintz, B Pfleiderer, B Tombach, W Heindel.   

Abstract

The increasing availability of high-field (3 T) MR scanners requires adapting and optimizing clinical imaging protocols to exploit the theoretically higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the higher field strength. Our aim was to establish reliable and stable protocols meeting the clinical demands for imaging the neurocranium at 3 T. Two hundred patients with a broad range of indications received an examination of the neurocranium with an appropriate assortment of imaging techniques at 3 T. Several imaging parameters were optimized. Keeping scan times comparable to those at 1.5 T we increased spatial resolution. Contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced T1-weighted imaging was best applying gradient-echo and inversion recovery (rather than spin-echo) techniques, respectively. For fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging a TE of 120 ms yielded optimum contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). High-resolution isotropic 3D data sets were acquired within reasonable scan times. Some artifacts were pronounced, but generally imaging profited from the higher SNR. We present a set of optimized examination protocols for neuroimaging at 3 T, which proved to be reliable in a clinical routine setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12845470     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1984-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  J P Wansapura; S K Holland; R S Dunn; W S Ball
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial observations.

Authors:  S Hunsche; M E Moseley; P Stoeter; M Hedehus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; J Huston; C Lin; G F Gibbs; J P Felmlee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Application of magnetization transfer at 3.0 T in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial arteries.

Authors:  Steven D Thomas; Osama Al-Kwifi; Derek J Emery; Alan H Wilman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Safety of strong, static magnetic fields.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2-weighted and T2*-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  R J Ordidge; J M Gorell; J C Deniau; R A Knight; J A Helpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Imaging findings of cochlear nerve deficiency.

Authors:  Christine M Glastonbury; H Christian Davidson; H Ric Harnsberger; John Butler; Thomas R Kertesz; Clough Shelton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Microanatomy of the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal: study with new magnetic resonance imaging technique using three-dimensional fast spin echo.

Authors:  H Mitsuoka; H Arai; A Tsunoda; O Okuda; K Sato; J Makita
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke.

Authors:  D J Werring; A T Toosy; C A Clark; G J Parker; G J Barker; D H Miller; A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  14 in total

1.  High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  M Garcia; R Naraghi; T Zumbrunn; J Rösch; P Hastreiter; A Dörfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Tokiko Koshikawa; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisashi Kawai; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki; Tomomi Komada; Katsuya Maruyama; Osamu Takizawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential.

Authors:  Fritz Schick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Detection of lesions in multiple sclerosis by 2D FLAIR and single-slab 3D FLAIR sequences at 3.0 T: initial results.

Authors:  Andrea Bink; Melanie Schmitt; Jochen Gaa; John P Mugler; Heinrich Lanfermann; Friedhelm E Zanella
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain at 3 T: an update.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Francesca Trojsi; Michela Tosetti; Timo Schirmer; Silke M Lechner; Teresa Popolizio; Tommaso Scarabino
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Signal intensity of motor and sensory cortices on T2-weighted and FLAIR images: intraindividual comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI.

Authors:  Koji Kamada; Shingo Kakeda; Norihiro Ohnari; Junji Moriya; Toru Sato; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Rainald Bachmann; Ralf Reilmann; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel; Stefan Krämer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  MR imaging of gastric cancer in vitro: accuracy of invasion depth diagnosis.

Authors:  Chiho Sato; Shinji Naganawa; Hisashi Kumada; Shunichi Miura; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3T MR imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging.

Authors:  Y Kato; S Higano; H Tamura; S Mugikura; A Umetsu; T Murata; S Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI at 7.0 Tesla: comparison with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Jeroen Hendrikse; Fredy Visser; Taro Takahara; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.