Literature DB >> 29212354

Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants.

Hyun Gi Kim1, Jin Wook Choi1, Soo Han Yoon2, Sieun Lee3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Infants are vulnerable to high acoustic noise. Acoustic noise generated by MR scanning can be reduced by a silent sequence. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of the conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences for brain imaging in infants.
METHODS: A total of 36 scans were acquired from 24 infants using a 3 T MR scanner. Each patient underwent both conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences. Acoustic noise level was measured. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the images taken with each sequence.
RESULTS: The sound pressure level of the conventional T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 92.1 dB and that of the silent T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 73.3 dB (reduction of 20%). On quantitative assessment, the two sequences (conventional vs silent T2 PROPELLER) did not show significant difference in relative contrast (0.069 vs 0.068, p value = 0.536) and signal-to-noise ratio (75.4 vs 114.8, p value = 0.098). Qualitative assessment of overall image quality (p value = 0.572), grey-white differentiation (p value = 0.986), shunt-related artefact (p value > 0.999), motion artefact (p value = 0.801) and myelination degree in different brain regions (p values ≥ 0.092) did not show significant difference between the two sequences.
CONCLUSION: The silent T2 PROPELLER sequence reduces acoustic noise and generated comparable image quality to that of the conventional sequence. Advances in knowledge: This is the first report to compare silent T2 PROPELLER images with that of conventional T2 PROPELLER images in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212354      PMCID: PMC5965488          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  Acquiring simultaneous EEG and functional MRI.

Authors:  R I Goldman; J M Stern; J Engel; M S Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The effect of noise on the bispectral index during propofol sedation.

Authors:  D W Kim; H Y Kil; P F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  PROPELLER MRI: clinical testing of a novel technique for quantification and compensation of head motion.

Authors:  K P Forbes; J G Pipe; C R Bird; J E Heiserman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  MRI-compatible audio/visual system: impact on pediatric sedation.

Authors:  R K Harned; J D Strain
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2001-04

6.  Safety after chloral hydrate sedation of former preterm and term infants for magnetic resonance imaging: are the data clear?

Authors:  Charles J Coté
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient.

Authors:  Z H Cho; S T Chung; J Y Chung; S H Park; J S Kim; C H Moon; I K Hong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging.

Authors:  M E Quirk; A J Letendre; R A Ciottone; J F Lingley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Quiet PROPELLER MRI techniques match the quality of conventional PROPELLER brain imaging techniques.

Authors:  I Corcuera-Solano; A Doshi; P S Pawha; D Gui; A Gaddipati; L Tanenbaum
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Comparison of Silent and Conventional MR Imaging for the Evaluation of Myelination in Children.

Authors:  Chisato Matsuo-Hagiyama; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Hisashi Tanaka; Hiroto Takahashi; Atsuko Arisawa; Eri Yoshioka; Shin Nabatame; Sayaka Nakano; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.