Literature DB >> 15893942

fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.

D Tomasi1, E C Caparelli, L Chang, T Ernst.   

Abstract

Scanner noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may interfere with brain function and change blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals, a problem that generally worsens at the higher field strengths. Therefore, we studied the effect of increased acoustic noise on fMRI during verbal working memory (WM) processing. The sound pressure level of scanner noise was increased by 12 dBA from "Quiet" to "Loud" echo planar imaging (EPI) scans by utilizing resonant vibration modes of the gradient coil. A WM paradigm with graded levels of task difficulty was used to further access WM load. Increased scanner noise produced increased BOLD responses (percent signal change) bilaterally in the cerebellum, inferior (IFG), medial (medFG), and superior (SFG) frontal, fusiform (FusG), and the lingual (LG) gyri, and decreased BOLD responses bilaterally in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACG) and the putamen. This finding suggests greater recruitment of attention resources in these brain regions, probably to compensate for interference due to louder scanner noise. Increased working memory load increased the BOLD signals in IFG and the cerebellum, but decreased the BOLD signals in the putamen and the LG. These findings also support the idea that brain function requires additional attention resources under noisier conditions. Load- and acoustic-noise-related changes in BOLD responses correlated negatively in the WM network. This study demonstrates that MR noise affects brain activation pattern. Future comparisons between studies performed under different acoustic conditions (due to differing magnetic field strengths, pulse sequences, or scanner manufacturers) might require knowledge of the sound pressure level of acoustic noise during fMRI.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15893942      PMCID: PMC2449823          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  34 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hyperechoes.

Authors:  J Hennig; K Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T.

Authors:  D L Price; J P De Wilde; A M Papadaki; J S Curran; R I Kitney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Reduction of gradient acoustic noise in MRI using SENSE-EPI.

Authors:  Jacco A de Zwart; Peter van Gelderen; Peter Kellman; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Functional fields in human auditory cortex revealed by time-resolved fMRI without interference of EPI noise.

Authors:  F Di Salle; E Formisano; E Seifritz; D E Linden; K Scheffler; C Saulino; G Tedeschi; F E Zanella; A Pepino; R Goebel; E Marciano
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Practice-induced changes of brain function during visual attention: a parametric fMRI study at 4 Tesla.

Authors:  D Tomasi; T Ernst; E C Caparelli; L Chang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  High contrast and fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at high fields.

Authors:  J H Lee; M Garwood; R Menon; G Adriany; P Andersen; C L Truwit; K Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  76 in total

1.  Brain Activation during Addition and Subtraction Tasks In-Noise and In-Quiet.

Authors:  Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid; Ahmad Nazlim Yusoff; Siti Zamratol-Mai Sarah Mukari; Mazlyfarina Mohamad
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-04

2.  Effects of chronic and acute stimulants on brain functional connectivity hubs.

Authors:  Anna B Konova; Scott J Moeller; Dardo Tomasi; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Macrovascular contribution in activation patterns of working memory.

Authors:  Dardo G Tomasi; Elisabeth C Caparelli
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Different activation patterns for working memory load and visual attention load.

Authors:  D Tomasi; L Chang; E C Caparelli; T Ernst
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The human immunodeficiency virus reduces network capacity: acoustic noise effect.

Authors:  Dardo Tomasi; Linda Chang; Elisabeth de Castro Caparelli; Frank Telang; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Common deactivation patterns during working memory and visual attention tasks: an intra-subject fMRI study at 4 Tesla.

Authors:  Dardo Tomasi; Thomas Ernst; Elisabeth C Caparelli; Linda Chang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Widespread disruption in brain activation patterns to a working memory task during cocaine abstinence.

Authors:  D Tomasi; R Z Goldstein; F Telang; T Maloney; N Alia-Klein; E C Caparelli; N D Volkow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Sex differences in sensory gating of the thalamus during auditory interference of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; L Chang; E C Caparelli; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.