Literature DB >> 12942300

Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?

P Doherty1, D O'Leary, P C Brennan.   

Abstract

Increasing beam energies are well established as a radiation dose-reducing tool in diagnostic radiology. This has led to useful recommendations by the Commission of European Communities (CEC) for appropriate kVp values to be employed for a variety of examinations. The current work tests the hypothesis that kVp levels above those recommended by the CEC will result in reduced patient dose while still producing images of acceptable quality. This study explored the effect of a range of kVp levels within and above CEC recommendations for lumbar spine radiology. A phantom investigation facilitated selection of appropriate kVp levels for a patient study ( n=59): 81 kVp (CEC) and 96 kVp (non-CEC) for the AP projection and 90 kVp (CEC) and 102 kVp (non-CEC) for the lateral projection. Entrance surface and effective dose were calculated and image quality quantified using CEC image criteria and images of a detail contrast test tool. Data analysis demonstrated significant reduction in effective radiation dose for AP (29.9%) and lateral (24.6%) when a kVp value above the CEC range was employed compared with a kVp recommended by the CEC. Although significant reductions in total image quality of 18.3% and 10.1% for the antero-posterior and lateral projections, respectively, were noted, all patient images produced with all kVp values were considered acceptable by each member of the evaluative panel with all image criteria receiving a score of 2 (out of 3) or better. The psychophysical tests revealed minor non-significant reductions in visualisation scores. The current study demonstrated that kVp values outside the CEC recommended range offer reductions in dose while producing acceptable images. Practitioners should be guided, rather than constrained, by the CEC recommendations on good radiographic technique. The need for further work exploring the effect of higher energies on visualisation of subtle pathological lesions has been identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942300     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1810-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.

Authors:  K Nishikawa; H Shibuya; M Wakoh; K Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.

Authors:  A Almén; A Tingberg; S Mattsson; J Besjakov; S Kheddache; B Lanhede; L G Månsson; M Zankl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique.

Authors:  P C Brennan; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial.

Authors:  E Vañó; S Oliete; L González; E Guibelalde; A Velasco; J M Fernández
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  X-ray beam energy, scatter, and radiation risk in chest radiography.

Authors:  T J Petrone; K D Steidley; A Appleby; E Christman; F Haughey
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Lowering patient dose on single-phase X-ray units.

Authors:  K Fung
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb

7.  Estimation of doses received by patients undergoing radiological examinations in Greece.

Authors:  E Papageorgiou; E Vardalaki; C J Hourdakis; P Dimitriou
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Lumbar spine radiology: analysis of the posteroanterior projection.

Authors:  P C Brennan; E Madigan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Implementation of a programme for reduction of radiographic doses and results achieved through increases in tube potential.

Authors:  C J Martin; C L Darragh; G A McKenzie; A P Bayliss
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Optimization of radiographic technique for chest radiography.

Authors:  H M Warren-Forward; J S Millar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  5 in total

1.  Organ and effective dose conversion coefficients for radiographic examinations of the pediatric skull estimated by Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  J Stratakis; J Damilakis; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Technique and radiation dose of conventional X-rays and computed tomography of the sacroiliac joint].

Authors:  A G Jurik
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Image quality is resilient against tube voltage variations in post-mortem skeletal radiography with a digital flat-panel detector.

Authors:  S Notohamiprodjo; K M Roeper; K M Treitl; B Hoberg; F Wanninger; L Verstreepen; F G Mueck; D Maxien; F Fischer; O Peschel; S Wirth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Optimizing imaging quality and radiation dose by the age-dependent setting of tube voltage in pediatric chest digital radiography.

Authors:  Hui Guo; Wen-Ya Liu; Xiao-Ye He; Xiao-Shan Zhou; Qun-Li Zeng; Bai-Yan Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  Nicole E Peacock; Adam L Steward; Peter J Riley
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-06-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.