Literature DB >> 7297851

The molecular basis of dominance.

H Kacser, J A Burns.   

Abstract

The best known genes of microbes, mice and men are those that specify enzymes. Wild type, mutant and heterozygote for variants of such genes differ in the catalytic activity at the step in the enzyme network specified by the gene in question. The effect on the respective phenotypes of such changes in catalytic activity, however, is not defined by the enzymes change as estimated by in vitro determination of the activities obtained from the extracts of the three groups. In vivo enzymes do not act in isolation, but are kinetically linked to other enzymes via their substrates and products. These interactions modify the effect of enzyme variation on the phenotype, depending on the nature and quantity of the other enzymes present. An output of such a system, say a flux, is therefore a systemic property, and its response to variation at one locus must be measured in the whole system. This response is best described by the sensitivity coefficient, Z, while is defined by the fractional change in flux over the fractional change in enzyme activity. (formula: see text). Its magnitude determines the extent to which a particular enzyme "controls" a particular flux or phenotype and, implicitly, determines the values that the three phenotypes will have. There are as many sensitivity coefficients for a given flux as there are enzymes in the system. It can be shown that the sum of all such coefficients equals unity. (formula: see text). Since n, the number of enzymes, is large, this summation property results in the individual coefficients being small. The effect of making a large change in enzyme activity therefore usually results in only a negligible change in flux. A reduction to 50% activity in the heterozygote, a common feature for many mutants, is therefore not expected to be detectable in the phenotype. The mutant would therefore be described as "recessive". The widespread occurrence of recessive mutants is thus seen to be the inevitable consequence of the kinetic structure of enzyme networks. The ad hoc hypothesis of "modifiers" selected to maximize the fitness of the heterozygote, as proposed by Fisher, is therefore unnecessary. It is based on the false general expectation of an intermediate phenotype in the heterozygote. Wright's analysis, substantially sound in its approach, proposed selection of a "safety factor" in enzyme activity. The derivation of the summation property explains why such safety factors are automatically present in almost all enzymes without selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7297851      PMCID: PMC1214416     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  Mathematical analysis of multienzyme systems. II. Steady state and transient control.

Authors:  R Heinrich; T A Rapoport
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Genetic regulation of tissue-specific expression of amylase structural genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  I Abraham; W W Doane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products. I. Nomenclature and rate equations.

Authors:  W W CLELAND
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1963-01-08

4.  The detection in the heterozygote of the metabolic effect of the recessive gene for phenylketonuria.

Authors:  W E KNOX; E C MESSINGER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The effect of natural selection on enzymic catalysis.

Authors:  A Cornish-Bowden
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1976-02-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  MOlecular democracy: who shares the controls?

Authors:  H Kacser; J A Burns
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.407

7.  Histidinaemia in mouse and man.

Authors:  G Bulfield; H Kacser
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Histidinaemic mutant in the mouse.

Authors:  H Kacser; G Bulfield; M E Wallace
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  D L Lindsley; L Sandler; B S Baker; A T Carpenter; R E Denell; J C Hall; P A Jacobs; G L Miklos; B K Davis; R C Gethmann; R W Hardy; A H Steven; M Miller; H Nozawa; D M Parry; M Gould-Somero; M Gould-Somero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  327 in total

1.  Fluxes and metabolic pools as model traits for quantitative genetics. I. The L-shaped distribution of gene effects.

Authors:  B Bost; C Dillmann; D de Vienne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

Authors:  R J Anderson; H G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic and nongenetic bases for the L-shaped distribution of quantitative trait loci effects.

Authors:  B Bost; D de Vienne; F Hospital; L Moreau; C Dillmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Tissue variation in the control of oxidative phosphorylation: implication for mitochondrial diseases.

Authors:  R Rossignol; T Letellier; M Malgat; C Rocher; J P Mazat
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Zimmerman; A Palsson; G Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Multiorgan autonomic dysfunction in mice lacking the beta2 and the beta4 subunits of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  W Xu; A Orr-Urtreger; F Nigro; S Gelber; C B Sutcliffe; D Armstrong; J W Patrick; L W Role; A L Beaudet; M De Biasi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Epigenetics of dominance for enzyme activity.

Authors:  Kuldip S Trehan; Kulbir S Gill
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Nonlinear developmental processes as sources of dominance.

Authors:  M A Gilchrist; H F Nijhout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The Loss of GSTM1 Associates with Kidney Failure and Heart Failure.

Authors:  Adrienne Tin; Robert Scharpf; Michelle M Estrella; Bing Yu; Megan L Grove; Patricia P Chang; Kunihiro Matsushita; Anna Köttgen; Dan E Arking; Eric Boerwinkle; Thu H Le; Josef Coresh; Morgan E Grams
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.