Literature DB >> 11404351

Recessive mutations and the maintenance of sex in structured populations.

A F Agrawal1, J R Chasnov.   

Abstract

The evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction remains a controversial problem. It was recently shown that recessive deleterious mutations create differences in the mutation load of sexual vs. asexual populations. Here we show that low levels of population structure or inbreeding can greatly enhance the importance of recessive deleterious mutations in the context of sexual vs. asexual populations. With population structure, the cost of sex can be substantially reduced or even eliminated for realistic levels of dominance.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11404351      PMCID: PMC1461672     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  18 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  T Lenormand; S P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Why sex and recombination?

Authors:  N H Barton; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer.

Authors:  E Szathmáry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  R S Howard; C M Lively
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The cost of sex in relation to mating system.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  18 in total

1.  Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Selection for recombination in structured populations.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Sarah P Otto; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation.

Authors:  Mohammad A Mandegar; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.