Literature DB >> 2725643

Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

M Kirkpatrick1, C D Jenkins.   

Abstract

Sexual reproduction confronts evolutionary biology with a paradox: other things being equal, an asexual (all-female) population will have twice the reproductive potential of a competing sexual population and therefore should rapidly drive the sexual population to extinction. Thus, the persistence of sexual reproduction in most life forms implies a compensatory advantage to sexual reproduction. Work on this problem has emphasized the evolutionary advantages produced by the genetic recombination that accompanies sexual reproduction. Here we show that genetic segregation produces an advantage to sexual reproduction even in the absence of an advantage from recombination. Segregation in a diploid sexual population allows selection to carry a single advantageous mutation to a homozygous state, whereas two separate mutations are required in a parthenogenetic population. The complete fixation of advantageous mutations is thus delayed in a heterozygous state in asexual populations. Calculation of the selective load incurred suggests that it may offset the intrinsic twofold reproductive advantage of asexual reproduction and maintain sexual reproduction in diploid populations.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2725643     DOI: 10.1038/339300a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  J R Chasnov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Segregation and the evolution of sex under overdominant selection.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation.

Authors:  Mohammad A Mandegar; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Richard E Michod
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evidence for degenerate tetraploidy in bdelloid rotifers.

Authors:  David B Mark Welch; Jessica L Mark Welch; Matthew Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic diversity and fitness in small populations of partially asexual, self-incompatible plants.

Authors:  M Navascués; S Stoeckel; S Mariette
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Limited dispersal, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  J R Peck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review).

Authors:  W D Hamilton; R Axelrod; R Tanese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.