Literature DB >> 10966092

Measuring the "managedness" and covered benefits of health plans.

D E Grembowski1, P Diehr, L C Novak, A E Roussel, D P Martin, D L Patrick, B Williams, C M Ulrich.   

Abstract

STUDY AIMS: (1) To develop indexes measuring the degree of managedness and the covered benefits of health insurance plans, (2) to describe the variation in these indexes among plans in one health insurance market, (3) to assess the validity of the health plan indexes, and (4) to examine the association between patient characteristics and the health plan indexes. Measures of the "managedness" and covered benefits of health plans are requisite for studying the effects of managed care on clinical practice and health system performance, and they may improve people's understanding of our complex health care system. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: As part of our larger Physician Referral Study, we collected health insurance information for 189 insurance product lines and 755 products in the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area, which we linked with the study's data for 2,277 patients recruited in local primary care offices. STUDY
DESIGN: Managed care and benefit variables were constructed through content analysis of health plan information. Principal component analysis of the variables produced a managedness index, an in-network benefits index, and an out-of-network benefits index. Bivariable analyses examined associations between patient characteristics and the three indexes. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: From the managed care variables, we constructed three provider-oriented indexes for the financial, utilization management, and network domains of health plans. From these, we constructed a single managedness index, which correlated as expected with the individual measures, with the domain indexes, with plan type (FFS, PPO, POS, HMO), with independent assessments of local experts, and with patients' attitudes about their health insurance. For benefits, we constructed an in-network benefits index and an out-of-network benefits index, which were correlated with the managedness index. The personal characteristics of study patients were associated with the managed care and benefit indexes. Study patients in more managed plans reported somewhat better health than patients in less managed plans.
CONCLUSIONS: Indexes of the managedness and benefits of health plans can be constructed from publicly available information. The managedness and benefit indexes are associated with the personal characteristics and health status of study patients. Potential uses of the managed care and benefits indexes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966092      PMCID: PMC1089144     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  Vertical restraints and powerful health insurers: exclusionary conduct masquerading as managed care?

Authors:  F H Miller
Journal:  Law Contemp Probl       Date:  1988

Review 2.  The demand for health insurance and health care: a review of the empirical literature.

Authors:  R W Broyles; M D Rosko
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1988

3.  The American health care system. Managed care.

Authors:  J K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Behind the curve: a critical assessment of how little is known about arrangements between managed care plans and physicians.

Authors:  M Gold; L Nelson; T Lake; R Hurley; R Berenson
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 5.  The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care.

Authors:  R A Dudley; R H Miller; T Y Korenbrot; H S Luft
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 6.  The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL). A measure of primary symptom dimensions.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; R S Lipman; K Rickels; E H Uhlenhuth; L Covi
Journal:  Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1974

7.  The effects of regulation, competition, and ownership on mortality rates among hospital inpatients.

Authors:  S M Shortell; E F Hughes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  How do financial incentives affect physicians' clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations?

Authors:  A L Hillman; M V Pauly; J J Kerstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians.

Authors:  M R Gold; R Hurley; T Lake; T Ensor; R Berenson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  How the medical comorbidity of depressed patients differs across health care settings: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  K B Wells; W Rogers; A Burnam; S Greenfield; J E Ware
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  14 in total

1.  National health insurance or incremental reform: aim high, or at our feet?

Authors:  David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Understanding the organization of public health delivery systems: an empirical typology.

Authors:  Glen P Mays; F Douglas Scutchfield; Michelyn W Bhandari; Sharla A Smith
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Conceptualizing a quality plan for healthcare. A philosophical reflection on the relevance of the health profession to society.

Authors:  S Mehrdad Mohammadi; S Farzad Mohammadi; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

4.  Changes in how health plans provide behavioral health services.

Authors:  Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Elizabeth Levy Merrick; Dominic Hodgkin
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  National health insurance or incremental reform: aim high, or at our feet?

Authors:  David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Accessing specialty behavioral health treatment in private health plans.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Merrick; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Sharon Reif; Maureen T Stewart
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Moving beyond the typologies of managed care: the example of health plan predictors of screening mammography.

Authors:  Sherilyn Tye; Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Are gatekeeper requirements associated with cancer screening utilization?

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Jennifer S Haas; Su-Ying Liang; Laurence C Baker; Sherilyn Tye; Karla Kerlikowske; Julie Sakowski; Joanne Spetz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Managed care, access to specialists, and outcomes among primary care patients with pain.

Authors:  David E Grembowski; Diane Martin; Paula Diehr; Donald L Patrick; Barbara Williams; Louise Novak; Richard Deyo; Wayne Katon; Deborah Dickstein; Ruth Engelberg; Harold Goldberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Organizational factors and depression management in community-based primary care settings.

Authors:  Edward P Post; Amy M Kilbourne; Robert W Bremer; Francis X Solano; Harold Alan Pincus; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.