Literature DB >> 9879306

The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care.

R A Dudley1, R H Miller, T Y Korenbrot, H S Luft.   

Abstract

Purchasers of health care could offer financial incentives to plans or providers in order to increase quality. Unfortunately, the current health care market, in which quality is rarely measured and there is no risk adjustment, actively discourages both plans and providers from maximizing quality, resulting in a poor overall level of quality, both in fee-for-service arrangements and health maintenance organizations. Health plans and providers will not focus on quality until mechanisms to correct for risk differences among enrollees can be developed. Although such risk adjustment will be the most important stimulus for quality, it should also be linked to improvements in information systems and agreement on a minimum benefits package, quality reporting standards, and financial solvency requirements.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9879306      PMCID: PMC2751095          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  21 in total

Review 1.  Reducing disparities through culturally competent health care: an analysis of the business case.

Authors:  Cindy Brach; Irene Fraser
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.926

2.  Provider attitudes toward pay-for-performance programs: development and validation of a measurement instrument.

Authors:  Mark Meterko; Gary J Young; Bert White; Barbara G Bokhour; James F Burgess; Dan Berlowitz; Matthew R Guldin; Marjorie Nealon Seibert
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Conceptualizing a quality plan for healthcare. A philosophical reflection on the relevance of the health profession to society.

Authors:  S Mehrdad Mohammadi; S Farzad Mohammadi; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

4.  Should we have confidence if a physician is accredited? A study of the relative impacts of accreditation and insurance payments on quality of care in the Philippines.

Authors:  Stella A Quimbo; John W Peabody; Riti Shimkhada; Kimberly Woo; Orville Solon
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Patient-reported access to primary care in Ontario: effect of organizational characteristics.

Authors:  Elizabeth Muggah; William Hogg; Simone Dahrouge; Grant Russell; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Laura Muldoon; Rose Anne Devlin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

Review 7.  An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Martin P Eccles; Sasha Shepperd; Anthony Scott; Elena Parmelli; Fiona R Beyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

8.  Are physician reimbursement strategies associated with processes of care and patient satisfaction for patients with diabetes in managed care?

Authors:  Susan L Ettner; Theodore J Thompson; Mark R Stevens; Carol M Mangione; Catherine Kim; W Neil Steers; Jennifer Goewey; Arleen F Brown; Richard S Chung; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Nishchay Mehta; Anne Schilder; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.