CONTEXT: Policy discussions about improving the U.S. health care system increasingly recognize the need to strengthen its capacities for delivering public health services. A better understanding of how public health delivery systems are organized across the United States is critical to improvement. To facilitate the development of such evidence, this article presents an empirical method of classifying and comparing public health delivery systems based on key elements of their organizational structure. METHODS: This analysis uses data collected through a national longitudinal survey of local public health agencies serving communities with at least 100,000 residents. The survey measured the availability of twenty core public health activities in local communities and the types of organizations contributing to each activity. Cluster analysis differentiated local delivery systems based on the scope of activities delivered, the range of organizations contributing, and the distribution of effort within the system. FINDINGS: Public health delivery systems varied widely in organizational structure, but the observed patterns of variation suggested that systems adhere to one of seven distinct configurations. Systems frequently migrated from one configuration to another over time, with an overall trend toward offering a broader scope of services and engaging a wider range of organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Public health delivery systems exhibit important structural differences that may influence their operations and outcomes. The typology developed through this analysis can facilitate comparative studies to identify which delivery system configurations perform best in which contexts.
CONTEXT: Policy discussions about improving the U.S. health care system increasingly recognize the need to strengthen its capacities for delivering public health services. A better understanding of how public health delivery systems are organized across the United States is critical to improvement. To facilitate the development of such evidence, this article presents an empirical method of classifying and comparing public health delivery systems based on key elements of their organizational structure. METHODS: This analysis uses data collected through a national longitudinal survey of local public health agencies serving communities with at least 100,000 residents. The survey measured the availability of twenty core public health activities in local communities and the types of organizations contributing to each activity. Cluster analysis differentiated local delivery systems based on the scope of activities delivered, the range of organizations contributing, and the distribution of effort within the system. FINDINGS: Public health delivery systems varied widely in organizational structure, but the observed patterns of variation suggested that systems adhere to one of seven distinct configurations. Systems frequently migrated from one configuration to another over time, with an overall trend toward offering a broader scope of services and engaging a wider range of organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Public health delivery systems exhibit important structural differences that may influence their operations and outcomes. The typology developed through this analysis can facilitate comparative studies to identify which delivery system configurations perform best in which contexts.
Authors: Glen P Mays; Megan C McHugh; Kyumin Shim; Natalie Perry; Dennis Lenaway; Paul K Halverson; Ramal Moonesinghe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lisa K Gilbert; Jane Bulger; Kelli Scanlon; Kathy Ford; David Bergmire-Sweat; Cindy Weinbaum Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Brenda Robles; Linghui Jiang; Michael Prelip; Tabashir Z Nobari; Amy Wang; Tony Kuo; May C Wang Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Sarah Lampe; Adam Atherly; Lisa VanRaemdonck; Kathleen Matthews; Julie Marshall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 9.308