Literature DB >> 14965082

Are gatekeeper requirements associated with cancer screening utilization?

Kathryn A Phillips1, Jennifer S Haas, Su-Ying Liang, Laurence C Baker, Sherilyn Tye, Karla Kerlikowske, Julie Sakowski, Joanne Spetz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is widespread debate over whether health plans should require enrollees to use "gatekeepers," which are primary care providers that coordinate care and control access to specialists. However, little is known about whether health plan gatekeeper requirements improve or reduce quality-of-care. Our objective was to examine whether gatekeeper requirements are associated with the utilization of cancer screening for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: Three linked sources (N = 13,534): (1) 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Household Survey, a nationally representative, ongoing survey sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; (2) 1996 MEPS Health Insurance Plan Abstraction, which codes data from health plan booklets obtained from privately insured respondents, and (3) 1995 National Health Interview Survey. STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: Cross-sectional, multivariate logistic regression analysis using secondary data. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We found in multivariate analyses that women in gatekeeper plans were significantly more likely to obtain mammography screening (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.22, 95 percent Confidence Interval [CI] 1.07-1.40), clinical breast examinations (OR = 1.39, 95 percent CI 1.23-1.57), and Pap smears (OR = 1.33, 95 percent CI 1.16-1.52) than women not in gatekeeper plans. In contrast, gatekeeper requirements were not associated with prostate cancer screening (OR = 1.11, 95 percent CI 0.93-1.33). We found no association between screening utilization and aggregate plan types (HMO, POS, PPO, FFS).
CONCLUSIONS: Gatekeeper requirements are associated with higher utilization of widely recommended cancer screening procedures, but not with utilization of a less uniformly recommended cancer screening procedure. Researchers should consider the analysis of specific plan characteristics rather than aggregate plan types in conducting future research, and insurers and policymakers should consider the potential benefits of gatekeepers with respect to preventive care when designing health plans and legislation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14965082      PMCID: PMC1360999          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00220.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  50 in total

1.  Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  G Solanki; H H Schauffler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Use of preventive services by managed care enrollees: an updated perspective.

Authors:  K A Phillips; S Fernyak; A L Potosky; H H Schauffler; M Egorin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Leaving gatekeeping behind--effects of opening access to specialists for adults in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  T G Ferris; Y Chang; D Blumenthal; S D Pearson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Toward new typologies for HMOs.

Authors:  W P Welch; A L Hillman; M V Pauly
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists.

Authors:  K Grumbach; J V Selby; C Damberg; A B Bindman; C Quesenberry; A Truman; C Uratsu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Out-of-pocket expenditures for oral contraceptives and number of packs per purchase.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Naomi E Stotland; Su-Ying Liang; Joanne Spetz; Jennifer S Haas; Eyal Oren
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2004

7.  The influence of dentist supply on the relationship between fluoridation and restorative care among children.

Authors:  D Grembowski; P Milgrom
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Moving beyond the typologies of managed care: the example of health plan predictors of screening mammography.

Authors:  Sherilyn Tye; Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Effect of managed care insurance on the use of preventive care for specific ethnic groups in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn A Phillips; Dean Sonneborn; Charles E McCulloch; Su-Ying Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of studying the effects of managed care as managed care evolves.

Authors:  Alex D Federman; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Kathryn A Phillips; Jennifer S Haas; Su-Ying Liang; Dean Sonneborn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The National Programme for Information Technology: the GP as gatekeeper--a bastion worth fighting for?

Authors:  Nicola Shaw; Gergely Hegedus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and cancer screening among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Racquel E Kohler; Gail A Jensen; Stacey L Sheridan; William R Carpenter; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Breast and cervical cancer screening patterns among American Indian women at IHS clinics in Montana and Wyoming.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Jennifer Giroux; Kathryn Rita Kasicky; Bethany Hemlock Fatupaito; Eric C Wood; Renee Crichlow; Neil A Sun Rhodes; Jennifer Tingueley; Andrea Walling; Kathryn Langwell; Nathaniel Cobb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Franco Sassi; Harold S Luft; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Cancer screening practices among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors: results from the 2001 and 2003 California health interview survey.

Authors:  Erica S Breslau; Diana D Jeffery; William W Davis; Richard P Moser; Timothy S McNeel; Sarah Hawley
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Has the use of physician gatekeepers declined among HMOs? Evidence from the United States.

Authors:  Hai Fang; Hong Liu; John A Rizzo
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-04-09

9.  Influence of primary care on breast cancer outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Jeanne M Ferrante; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ren Chen; Kymia M Love-Jackson; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Kate J Fisher; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Managed care and cancer outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Thomas N Chirikos; Kristen J Wells; Ellen P McCarthy; Long H Ngo; Donglin Li; Reed E Drews; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.