Literature DB >> 12650378

Managed care, access to specialists, and outcomes among primary care patients with pain.

David E Grembowski1, Diane Martin, Paula Diehr, Donald L Patrick, Barbara Williams, Louise Novak, Richard Deyo, Wayne Katon, Deborah Dickstein, Ruth Engelberg, Harold Goldberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether managed care controls were associated with reduced access to specialists and worse outcomes among primary care patients with pain. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Patient, physician, and office manager questionnaires collected in the Seattle area in 1996-1997, plus data abstracted from patient records and health plans. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 2,275 adult patients with common pain problems recruited in the offices of 261 primary care physicians in Seattle. DATA COLLECTION: Patients completed a waiting room questionnaire and follow-up surveys at the end of the first and sixth months to measure access to specialists and outcomes. Intensity of managed care controls measured by plan managed care index and benefit/cost-sharing indexes, office managed care index, physician compensation, financial incentives, and use of clinical guidelines. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A financial withhold for referral was associated with a lower likelihood of referral to a physician specialist, a greater likelihood of seeing a specialist without referral, and a lower patient rating of care from the primary physician. Otherwise, patients in more managed offices and with greater out-of-network plan benefits had greater access to specialists. Patients with more versus less managed care had similar health outcomes, but patients in more managed offices had lower ratings of care provided by their primary physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased managed care controls were generally not associated with reduced access to specialists and worse health outcomes for primary care patients with pain, but patients in more managed offices had lower ratings of care provided by their primary physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12650378      PMCID: PMC1360871          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  37 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  R D Hays; J A Shaul; V S Williams; J S Lubalin; L D Harris-Kojetin; S F Sweeny; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Referrals of adult patients from primary care: demographic disparities and their relationship to HMO insurance.

Authors:  P Franks; C M Clancy
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 3.  The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care.

Authors:  R A Dudley; R H Miller; T Y Korenbrot; H S Luft
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Passing the baton: HMOs' influence on referrals to specialty care.

Authors:  C B Forrest; R J Reid
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  The effect of managed care on quality: a review of recent evidence.

Authors:  F J Hellinger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-27

6.  Gatekeeping and referral of children and adolescents to specialty care.

Authors:  C B Forrest; G B Glade; B Starfield; A E Baker; M Kang; R J Reid
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The influence of gatekeeping and utilization review on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  E A Kerr; R D Hays; A Mitchinson; M Lee; A L Siu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Outcome in general medical patients presenting with common symptoms: a prospective study with a 2-week and a 3-month follow-up.

Authors:  K Kroenke; J L Jackson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; R A Deyo; M Battié; J Street; W Barlow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Primary care physicians' experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems.

Authors:  K Grumbach; D Osmond; K Vranizan; D Jaffe; A B Bindman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Economic efficiency of gate-keeping compared with fee for service plans: a Swiss example.

Authors:  Matthias Schwenkglenks; Georges Preiswerk; Roman Lehner; Fritz Weber; Thomas D Szucs
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Physician-reported barriers to referring cancer patients to specialists: prevalence, factors, and association with career satisfaction.

Authors:  Daniel H Kwon; Diana M Tisnado; Nancy L Keating; Carrie N Klabunde; John L Adams; Afshin Rastegar; Mark C Hornbrook; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Managed care and patient ratings of the quality of specialty care among patients with pain or depressive symptoms.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.