Literature DB >> 14965083

Moving beyond the typologies of managed care: the example of health plan predictors of screening mammography.

Sherilyn Tye1, Kathryn A Phillips, Su-Ying Liang, Jennifer S Haas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a framework of factors to characterize health plans, to identify how plan characteristics were measured in a national survey, and to apply our findings to an analysis of the predictors of screening mammography. DATA SOURCE: The primary data were from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. STUDY
DESIGN: Women ages 40+, with private insurance, and no history of breast cancer were included in the study (N = 2,909). We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate mammography utilization in the past two years relative to health plan and demographic factors. Health plan measures included whether there is a defined provider network, whether coverage is restricted to a network, use of gatekeepers, level of cost containment, copayment and deductible amounts, coinsurance rate, and breadth of benefit coverage. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We found no significant difference in reported mammography utilization using a dichotomous comparison of individuals enrolled in managed care versus indemnity plans. However, women in health plans with a defined provider network were more likely to report having received a mammogram in the past two years than those without networks (adjusted OR= 1.21, 95 percent CI = 1.07-1.36), and women in gatekeeper plans were more likely to report receiving mammography than those without gatekeepers (adjusted OR = 1.18, 95 percent CI = 1.03-1.36). Restricted out-of-network coverage, use of cost containment, enrollee cost sharing, and breadth of benefit coverage did not appear to affect mammography use.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to examine the effect of individual health plan components on the utilization of health care, rather than use the traditional broader categorizations of managed versus nonmanaged care or simple health plan typologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14965083      PMCID: PMC1361000          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  G Solanki; H H Schauffler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Use of preventive services by managed care enrollees: an updated perspective.

Authors:  K A Phillips; S Fernyak; A L Potosky; H H Schauffler; M Egorin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K R Morrison; R Andersen; L A Aday
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S A Feig; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick; V P Jackson; D B Kopans; B Monsees; E A Sickles; C B Stelling; M Zinninger; P Wilcox-Buchalla
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care.

Authors:  B E Landon; I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The role of managed care "products" in managed care "plans".

Authors:  M Gold; R Hurley
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K Kerlikowske; L C Baker; S W Chang; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Type of health care coverage and the likelihood of being screened for cancer.

Authors:  N P Gordon; T G Rundall; L Parker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997.

Authors:  A M Leitch; G D Dodd; M Costanza; M Linver; P Pressman; L McGinnis; R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Shifting the paradigm: monitoring access in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  E R Docteur; D C Colby; M Gold
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1996
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of studying the effects of managed care as managed care evolves.

Authors:  Alex D Federman; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Kathryn A Phillips; Jennifer S Haas; Su-Ying Liang; Dean Sonneborn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and cancer screening among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Racquel E Kohler; Gail A Jensen; Stacey L Sheridan; William R Carpenter; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Mammography utilization among Black and White Medicare beneficiaries in high breast cancer mortality US counties.

Authors:  Mandeep K Virk-Baker; Michelle Y Martin; Robert S Levine; Xin Wang; Tim R Nagy; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Poompong Sripa; Benedict Hayhoe; Priya Garg; Azeem Majeed; Geva Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Insurance disruption due to spousal Medicare transitions: implications for access to care and health care utilization for women approaching age 65.

Authors:  Jessica R Schumacher; Maureen A Smith; Jinn-Ing Liou; Nancy Pandhi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Are gatekeeper requirements associated with cancer screening utilization?

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Jennifer S Haas; Su-Ying Liang; Laurence C Baker; Sherilyn Tye; Karla Kerlikowske; Julie Sakowski; Joanne Spetz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Coverage and preventive screening.

Authors:  Daniella Meeker; Geoffrey F Joyce; Jesse Malkin; Steven M Teutsch; Anne C Haddix; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Su-Ying Liang; Kathryn A Phillips; Mika Nagamine; Uri Ladabaum; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 10.  Medicaid Expansions: Probing Medicaid's Filling of the Cancer Genetic Testing and Screening Space.

Authors:  Stephen M Modell; Lisa Schlager; Caitlin G Allen; Gail Marcus
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.