Literature DB >> 10936793

Pathology in the new medical curriculum: what has replaced the subject courses?

J R Nash1.   

Abstract

In line with the UK General Medical Council recommendations, the traditional, taught curriculum at Liverpool was replaced from 1996 by a new one using problem-based learning (PBL) as its principal method of information transfer. There is integration of clinical and preclinical studies, coupled with a reduction in the factual knowledge content and the disappearance of identifiable separate subject courses. Learning is now student-centred. This requires a new approach to the acquisition of pathology knowledge. 1. Pathology is included in all relevant PBL case scenarios by pathology representation on module planning and review committees. 2. Special study modules (SSMs) allow students to observe the practice of pathology including surgical and autopsy work, carry out a detailed study and write a dissertation. Career selectives are provided for individual students in the final year. 3. Clinicopathological (CPC) teaching meetings are held, with the discussion of case examples, clinicians and students contributing. 4. Assessments include the input of appropriate pathology content, integrated with other subjects. 5. A pathology teaching website is provided, containing images, notes, self-assessment questions, handouts, timetables and information. Although the 1996 intake have not yet completed their studies, the results of in-course assessments have been encouraging. The response to the pathology SSMs has been very positive, and the level of presentations and dissertations reached is of a high standard. With the disappearance of a separate subject course in pathology, the subject is being learned by other routes, and the students will complete their undergraduate course with a sound basis for proceeding with their further studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10936793     DOI: 10.1007/bf03032367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  10 in total

1.  Specialist registrar training. Some good news at last.

Authors:  G Catto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

Review 2.  Learner centred approaches in medical education.

Authors:  J A Spencer; R K Jordan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

3.  Are we providing doctors with the training and tools for lifelong learning?. Interview by Abi Berger.

Authors:  A F Shaughnessy; D C Slawson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

4.  Implementing problem based learning.

Authors:  L A Branda
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Problem-based learning: does it make a difference?

Authors:  B M Ferrier
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Problem based, small group learning.

Authors:  J Bligh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

Review 7.  Changes in health care and continuing medical education for the 21st century.

Authors:  A Towle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-24

8.  Essentials of problem-based learning.

Authors:  H J Walton; M B Matthews
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  The "McMaster Philosophy": an approach to medical education.

Authors:  V R Neufeld; H S Barrows
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1974-11

10.  The McMaster Medical education philosophy in theory, practice and historical perspective.

Authors:  W Pallie; D H Carr
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.650

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Unveiling Cancer.

Authors:  Ritu Lakhtakia; Ikram Burney; Asim Qureshi; Sinan Al-Azawi; Hamid Al-Badi; Shaikha Al-Hajri
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-08-24

Review 2.  The value of postmortem experience in undergraduate medical education: current perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew R Bamber; Thelma A Quince
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-03-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.