Literature DB >> 10878029

Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.

J Kapala1, D Copes, A Sproston, J Patel, D Jang, A Petrich, J Mahony, K Biers, M Chernesky.   

Abstract

Specimen pooling to achieve efficiency when testing urine specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids has been suggested. We pooled endocervical swabs from 1,288 women and also tested individual swabs by ligase chain reaction (LCR). Out of 53 positive specimens, pools of 4 or 8 specimens missed two positives, providing 96.2% accuracy compared to individual test results. Dilution and positive-control spiking experiments showed that negative specimens with inhibitors of LCR in the pool reduced the signal. Conversely, two extra positives, detected only through pooling, were negative by individual testing but became positive after storage, suggesting that fresh positive specimens with labile inhibitors may be positive in a pool because of dilution of inhibitors. For this population of women with a 4% prevalence of C. trachomatis infection, substantial savings in cost of reagents (55 to 63%) and technologist time (50 to 63%) made pooling strategies a desirable alternative to individual testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878029      PMCID: PMC86948     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Pooling urine samples for ligase chain reaction screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  K A Kacena; S B Quinn; M R Howell; G E Madico; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The impact on accuracy and cost of ligase chain reaction testing by pooling urine specimens for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  J Krepel; J Patel; A Sproston; F Hopkins; D Jang; J Mahony; M Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; L Pickard; S Chong; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections: progress and problems.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  The vaginal introitus: a novel site for Chlamydia trachomatis testing in women.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; R P Heine; A Rideout; I Macio; F DiBiasi; R L Sweet
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; J Sellors; K Luinstra; S Chong; S Castriciano; J B Mahony
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Use of pooling and outpatient laboratory specimens in an anonymous seroprevalence survey of HIV infection in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  C H Sherlock; S A Strathdee; T Le; D Sutherland; M V O'Shaughnessy; M T Schechter
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Pooling of urine specimens for PCR testing: a cost saving strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control programmes.

Authors:  R W Peeling; B Toye; P Jessamine; I Gemmill
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.519

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of laboratory testing methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the era of nucleic acid amplification.

Authors:  T J Battle; M R Golden; K L Suchland; J M Counts; J P Hughes; W E Stamm; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects.

Authors:  S A Morré; R van Dijk; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule; S K Kjaer; C Munk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Strategies for signal amplification in nucleic acid detection.

Authors:  S C Andras; J B Power; E C Cocking; M R Davey
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Pooling of clinical specimens prior to testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR is accurate and cost saving.

Authors:  Marian J Currie; Michelle McNiven; Tracey Yee; Ursula Schiemer; Francis J Bowden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Utility of pooled urine specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men attending public sexually transmitted infection clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR.

Authors:  Christina Lindan; Meenakshi Mathur; Sameer Kumta; Hermangi Jerajani; Alka Gogate; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Effect of endocervical specimen adequacy on ligase chain reaction detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M J Loeffelholz; S J Jirsa; R K Teske; J N Woods
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  The Use of Urine and Self-obtained Vaginal Swabs for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Authors:  Charlotte A. Gaydos; Anne M. Rompalo
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Evaluation of pooled ocular and vaginal swabs by the Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae compared to the GenProbe Aptima Combo 2 Assay.

Authors:  L Dize; S K West; H Mkocha; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  The laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  Max A Chernesky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.