Literature DB >> 9281409

Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.

M A Chernesky1, D Jang, J Sellors, K Luinstra, S Chong, S Castriciano, J B Mahony.   

Abstract

In a comparison of commercial ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Roche) assays, measuring plasmid genes of Chlamydia trachomatis, some specimens were found to be negative by either or both assays but positive in traditional culture or antigen detection tests. Of 767 women, 35 were found to be infected by cervical or urine testing. Twenty three specimens from 16 women may have contained inhibitors in six cervical swabs (CS) and 15 first void urines (FVU). By performing dilution and 'spiking' experiments on five FVU, inhibitors of PCR, LCR or both, which disappeared by dilution, were demonstrated. Confirmatory assays were used which amplified segments of the major outer membrane gene by PCR or LCR. When comparisons of assays were made on a single specimen type, the sensitivities of the amplification assays, compared to an expanded reference standard, were as follows: on CS, PCR was 93.8% (30/32) and LCR was 96.9% (31/32); on FVU, PCR was 76.6% (23/30) and LCR was 93.3% (28/30). When a combined calculation was made to determine the ability of the assays to detect patients infected in the cervix or urethra by testing FVU, the sensitivities dropped to 71.4% (25/35) for PCR and 80.0% (28/35) for LCR: CS sensitivity was 88.6% (31/35) for both amplified tests. There were two CS and five FVU false-positives by PCR which reduced to one CS and three FVU in the combined analysis. There were no false-positives by LCR. Inhibitors and low levels of chlamydial plasmid nucleic acids may have contributed to lower than expected sensitivities, suggesting a possible need for internal positive controls, especially for PCR, when testing urine. More studies with multiple sampling and more than one amplification assay are needed to confirm these findings and to identify and remove inhibitors of amplification assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9281409     DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.1997.0109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Probes        ISSN: 0890-8508            Impact factor:   2.365


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of the NucliSens Basic Kit for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital tract specimens using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  J B Mahony; X Song; S Chong; M Faught; T Salonga; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reproducibility problems with the Abbott laboratories LCx assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  A M Gronowski; S Copper; D Baorto; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Kapala; D Copes; A Sproston; J Patel; D Jang; A Petrich; J Mahony; K Biers; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Removal of PCR inhibitors by silica membranes: evaluating the Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis kit.

Authors:  B Böddinghaus; T A Wichelhaus; V Brade; T Bittner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine samples and tolerance of the assay to the presence of urea.

Authors:  Thomas Edwards; Patricia A Burke; Helen B Smalley; Liz Gillies; Glyn Hobbs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  External quality assessment for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  V J Chalker; H Vaughan; P Patel; A Rossouw; H Seyedzadeh; K Gerrard; V L A James
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories.

Authors:  Roel P Verkooyen; Gerda T Noordhoek; Paul E Klapper; Jim Reid; Jurjen Schirm; Graham M Cleator; Margareta Ieven; Gunnar Hoddevik
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in urine specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-positive women.

Authors:  Joeli A Brinkman; W Elizabeth Jones; Ann M Gaffga; Jonathan A Sanders; Anil K Chaturvedi; Joseph Slavinsky III; John L Clayton; Jeanne Dumestre; Michael E Hagensee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  The evaluation of diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Max A Chernesky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.

Authors:  Sally Land; Sepehr Tabrizi; Anthony Gust; Elizabeth Johnson; Susan Garland; Elizabeth M Dax
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.